The Tired Non-Conformist

Monday, January 8, 2024

An Overview of the WHO Negotiations

An Overview of the WHO Negotiations

After nearly two years of reporting on the WHO, many people have requested that I provide an overview of what is going on with the WHO negotiations. Please share this information far and wide.

James Roguski

Jan 2, 2024

204

IMPORTANT POINTS:

The best way to understand this issue is to watch the videos below.

Many people have confused the different documents that are involved.

The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2022 and 2024)
The proposed “Pandemic Agreement,” which most people refer to as the “Pandemic Treaty,” but is really a Framework Convention (which is a really, really bad idea).

THE 2022 AMENDMENTS TO THE IHR

The WHO has fraudulently claimed that it adopted amendments to the International Health Regulations on May 28, 2022, but it never bothered to actually conduct a vote.

This should be a worldwide scandal, but nearly everyone is ignoring this blatant fraud. CLICK HERE FOR DETAILS

THE 2024 AMENDMENTS TO THE IHR

Over 300 amendments to the International Health Regulations are currently being negotiated. These negotiations have been conducted in secret for over one year. The originally proposed amendments are available HERE. No updated or revised versions have ever been made public.

The deadline for the WHO to present the final package of targeted amendments is January 27, 2024. They have announced publicly that they are NOT going to meet their deadline. This should be all over the news, but practically no one is talking about it.

NO final version of the amendments has been provided. To learn more about the fast approaching deadline, CLICK HERE.

The next meeting of the Working Group for amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) is scheduled for February 5-9, 2024. LINK

SCROLL DOWN FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS

THE “PANDEMIC AGREEMENT”

The deadline for the WHO to present the final draft of the proposed “Pandemic Agreement” is in May 2024 at the 77th World Health Assembly. The latest version is located HERE.

The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) has been directed to rewrite the latest draft and have it ready before the next meeting which is scheduled for February 19 to March 1, 2024. LINK

SCROLL DOWN FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS

Please take the time to watch the videos below.

They provide a thorough overview of the negotiations currently being conducted by the World Health Organization.

https://tntvideo.podbean.com/e/james-roguski-on-worldstage-with-bruce-de-torres-17-december-2023/

The video below is one of the best briefings that I have ever given.

If you wish, you can skip the first 10 minutes, which is mostly introductions of the people who attended the briefing.

I published the following video one year ago …

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jKCzznE8CK2r/

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES ABOUT THE AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS:

The Deadline is January 27, 2024

James Roguski

December 27, 2023

SPREAD THE WORD… The Working Group for amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) has openly admitted that they are going to FAIL to meet their deadline. NO AMENDMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED AT THE 77TH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY IN MAY 2024 UNLESS A FINAL VERSION IS SUBMITTED FOUR(4) MONTHS IN ADVANCE (BY JANUARY 27, 2024).

Read full story

REJECT DIGITAL ENSLAVEMENT

James Roguski

March 7, 2023

SCROLL DOWN TO REVIEW THE MANY ACTIONS THAT YOU CAN TAKE Share this link: RejectDigitalEnslavement.com Use this hashtag: #RejectDigitalEnslavement

Read full story

https://www.who.int/initiatives/global-digital-health-certification-network

The World Health Assembly is Exceeding its Authority

James Roguski

June 30, 2023

The World Health Assembly is Exceeding its Authority

I submitted the following information as my public comment to the Office of Global Affairs in regards to the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.

Read full story

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES ABOUT THE PROPOSED “PANDEMIC AGREEMENT”

Let's Work Together

James Roguski

November 5, 2023

Please scroll down to watch the video and listen to the audio below… The Seventh meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body is scheduled to be held from Monday - Friday, November 6-10, 2023. They plan to discuss the latest version of the so-called “Pandemic Agreement.”

Read full story

The People's Declaration

James Roguski

September 4, 2023

Share this link: ThePeoplesDeclaration.com

Read full story

CENSORSHIP

James Roguski

May 29, 2023

CLICK HERE to take action to #ExitTheWHO The “Bureau’s Text” of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” includes a very important proposal (Article 18) designed to empower the World Health Organization to improve “Communication and Public Awareness.” Please watch the video below…

Read full story

Click on the article below…

Exit the United Nations and the WHO

James Roguski

December 12, 2023

SCROLL DOWN TO TAKE ACTION The two identical bills listed below would fully withdraw the United States from the United Nations and the World Health Organization and all of their associated entities. They are entitled the Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle Act

Read full story

LEARN MORE…

Informed-Dissent.com

StopTheGlobalAgenda.com

ThePeoplesDeclaration.com

ExitTheWHO.org

ExitTheWHO.com

RejectTheAmendments.com

StopTheAmendments.com

StopTheWHO.com

ScrewTheWHO.com

PreventGenocide2030.org

CanadianPetition.com

MaskCharade.com

Under Development…

DemandHealthFreedom.com

DemandHealthFreedom.org

HealthFreedomBillOfRights.com

James Roguski

The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.

If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.

JamesRoguski.com

JamesRoguski.substack.com/about

JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive

310-619-3055

All content is free to all readers.

All support is deeply appreciated.

----------------------------------------

Source

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/archive

Saturday, January 6, 2024

The single most important interview I've ever done: former Kaiser nurse Gail Macrae

The single most important interview I've ever done: former Kaiser nurse Gail Macrae

-----------------------------------------------

90% of the COVID deaths in hospitals were attributed to COVID treatment protocols. ICU doc estimated up to an 80% increase in mortality due to the COVID vaccine.

STEVE KIRSCH

DEC 31, 2023

889

631

Executive summary

My interview with former Kaiser Permanente Santa Rosa nurse Gail Macrae is the single most devastating interview I’ve done since I first started speaking out against the COVID vaccine in May 2021.

Key points of the interview include:

Hospitals were actually empty when the press told us they were full.
90% or more of the COVID deaths were actually caused by the treatment protocols dictated from above, not the virus. There were both early treatments as well as inpatient treatments available that reduced the COVID death rate by over 90%.
The COVID vaccines increased all-cause mortality in hospitals by up to 80% according to one ICU doctor I spoke to who worked in the same hospital as Gail and made meticulous notes on patient outcomes.
One of the potential reasons people believed that there was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” is that the EMR systems were programmed to default all COVID cases to unvaccinated and nurses weren’t told how to change it.
After the vaccines rolled out for an age group is when the hospitals started seeing very unusual things they’ve never seen or rarely seen before for that age group.
Doctors are still afraid to speak out.

Bottom line: it wasn’t the virus that caused the pandemic. It was our response to the virus (top-down dictated treatment protocols and vaccination directives) that caused nearly all the morbidity and mortality. It was all preventable had we listened to the people that our government wanted to silence.

Today, there is still a total lack of transparency of what happened in hospitals in 2021 after the shots rolled out. If the protocols and vaccinations were a huge success, why aren’t we seeing any hospital publish their numbers?

The 90 minute interview

Here are a few of the comments:

Key learnings: COVID period

All Sonoma county hospitals were at or below annual admission averages for the entire year of 2020.
Stanford Hospital was dead empty in April 2020, a time when the press said hospitals were overwhelmed. At peak, there were 11 COVID patients at Stanford. The peak number in the ICU was 4. The thinking at Stanford at the time was that the cases were low because everyone followed the protocol dictated by the health authority. They had no idea that every other hospital was experiencing the same lack of patients. It had nothing to do with the mitigation protocols.
Gail doesn’t know of any hospitals in California that were full of COVID patients. Her hospital was running at a fraction of capacity during this “crisis” (at peak they had 10 of the 30 COVID beds filled). They were sending staff members home because there wasn’t anything for them to do at work. The hospitals were like ghost towns. Note: 10 or fewer beds until November/December 2020, which is the normal time of year when hospitals fill every winter.
Most of the COVID deaths were actually caused by the COVID treatment protocols, not the virus. Gail and an ICU doctor I spoke with after the call estimated that at least 90% of the people who died were killed by the “COVID protocol.”
I also checked with Paul Marik and he agreed that the 90% of those who died in the hospital from COVID were killed by the protocol would be a fair estimate. Paul worked in the ICU at the time and had close to 100% success rate in saving COVID patients (only a few patients who came in really late or had a lot of comorbidities died). He was told to switch to the “hospital protocol” based on CDC guidance. He complied and 7 out of his next 7 patients died including one patient who was just 22 years old. Paul was not allowed by the hospital to use his protocol to save patient lives, so he resigned.
Hospitals force doctors to comply with the COVID protocols that were designed by the medical associations. If the doctors don’t comply, they will be fired and lose their license to practice medicine. So, unless they are ready to retire, they all comply even though it is killing people.
The hospital protocols are a two-edged sword: they withhold drugs like strong steroids that can save a patient’s life, and they administer drugs like remdesivir which causes people to die sooner. Or they will put people on ventilators. One nurse who got COVID threatened to sue the hospital if she didn’t get steroids. She got steroids and she’s alive today. I heard from a former Kaiser doc that high net worth patients are also able to negotiate treatment options.
One of the reasons it was a pandemic of the unvaccinated is that Gail said that the EMR systems like EPIC were programmed to default all COVID cases to be
”unvaccinated” and nurses weren’t told how to change it. They would make notations in the chart, but the statistics the hospital reports are based on the vaccine status field, not from notes. So anyone looking at hospital statistics could reasonably conclude that this is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” This happened in Kaiser. Unclear how many EPIC clients had the same programming.

Key learnings: Vaccine period

Anaphylaxis:
- Gail knew of at least 2 anaphylaxis reports in her unit after getting the very first shot of the COVID vaccine. There are 25 people in her unit. Both said they would be fired if they spoke about it and were very reluctant to disclose this information to Gail. Note: 2 anaphylaxis cases in 25 injections is a train wreck. The Pfizer Phase 3 trial reported no cases of anaphylaxis in the over 22,000 people who got the shots. So this should have stopped the shots immediately because there was clearly something seriously wrong with the manufactured product (compared to what was given to the trial participants). But nobody said anything because they didn’t want to get fired.
- Gail heard reports from a nurse doing vaccinations of the public of up to 8-12 anaphylaxis within 15 minutes of the shot per shift (around 100 people vaccinated per shift). This sounds very high and I was unable to verify this (the person no longer works at Kaiser). Have you heard of similar stats? Please let me know in the comments.
- The peer-reviewed literature says the rates of anaphylaxis after the COVID shot are 2.4 cases per 10,000 doses. In the Pfizer trial, there were 0 cases of anaphylaxis reported. Doctors are trained to trust the clinical trial data and assume that the injected vaccine is the same as the vaccine tested in the trial.
Some medical staff were told that if you report a vaccine side effect to VAERS, you would be fired.
Post Mar 2021, patients were admitted for a variety of unusual symptoms: clotting disorders she’d never heard of before, heart abnormalities, strokes, rapid onset autoimmune, rapid onset dementia. Basically, lots of very rare adverse events happening at a frequency that she had never seen before. She had 2 cases of Guillain Barre happening 24 hours after a vaccine, for example. So 4 total in 6 weeks (two confirmed less than 24 hours after the shot). Previously, 2 cases total in the previous 9 years. So something is causing this and it never happened during COVID.
Younger people started going to the hospital with unusual symptoms starting when the vaccine rolled out for their age group.
She experienced roughly an 8X increase in code blues being called (over hospital com systems) directly associated with onset of vaccination. This never happened during COVID.
In the summer of 2021, there were 3X higher admissions than the peak of the past 30 years (she misspoke in the video; she said 300% and she meant 3X).
After the vaccines rolled out for an age group is when the hospitals started seeing weird things they’ve never seen before that age group.
The COVID vaccines increased all-cause mortality in hospitals by up to 80% according to an ICU doctor I spoke with at Gail’s hospital.

Key learning: General

Doctors are still afraid to speak out. They don’t want to lose their job, license, or be ostracized by their peers. So they stay silent. I talked to one doctor at Gail’s hospital and she said she didn’t know how many doctors were “red pilled” because nobody brings it up. It’s a taboo topic.

Confirmation by others

My doctor, nurse, and paramedic friends corroborate what is said in this video.

If you have any nurses or doctors who believe Gail is not accurately representing what happened inside her hospital, please let me know in the comments.

An open call for counter-examples

I posted on X asking for a nurse or doctor to come forward and talk about how the vaccines reduced morbidity and mortality, but not a single person was willing to do that.

The post had over 16,000 views, but I didn’t get a single name!

But what I did get instead were posts like this one:

Summary

The COVID pandemic was created by our response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The hospital treatment protocols and the COVID vaccines were the two biggest offenders.

Today, most doctors are afraid to speak out about what is really happening. They stay silent. Few doctors want to lose their job or their medical license. So the killing will continue.

I hope that watching this video will help people to understand what is really happening. Educating people on what is going on is essential for change to happen.

----------------------------------------

Source

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-single-most-important-interview?

Friday, January 5, 2024

Watch: ‘Courageous’ Authors of ‘Canary In a Covid World’ Speak Out About Pandemic Fearmongering, Censorship

Watch: ‘Courageous’ Authors of ‘Canary In a Covid World’ Speak Out About Pandemic Fearmongering, Censorship

Jan 3, 2024

On this week’s “The Defender In-Depth” podcast, contributors to “Canary In a Covid World: How Propaganda and Censorship Changed Our (My) World” describe being censored and witnessing fearmongering while trying to counter false narratives.

defender podcast canary covid world feature

What was it like to espouse views contrary to establishment narratives during the COVID-19 pandemic?

This week on “The Defender In-Depth,” the editor and four contributors to “Canary In a Covid World: How Propaganda and Censorship Changed Our (My) World,” shared their experiences countering such narratives and overcoming censorship.

Guests included the book’s editor, C.H. Klotz, internationally acclaimed novelist Colin McAdam, award-winning journalist Rodney Palmer, mathematician and physician Sam Dubé, M.D., Ph.D., and writer and blogger Margaret Anna Alice.

The guests described their own experiences being a “canary in a COVID world” and their inspirations in helping to turn the book into a reality.

‘Courageous’ authors ‘have a story to tell’

Klotz described the book’s 34 authors as “a vast collection of really kind people that have stepped forward, that are courageous, that have a story to tell.”

Klotz said:

“They’re just a cross-section of society. They’re doctors, they’re scientists, they’re lawyers, they’re journalists, they’re mathematicians, they’re bloggers, they’re judges, they’re vaccine-injured.

“We just thought that if we brought these incredible people together and have them sing as one, then the choir might be something that others will listen to.”

According to Klotz, one of the central themes that runs across most of the chapters in “Canary In a Covid World” is censorship.

“[The contributors] all have important pieces of information to share, and a lot of that information … was censored,” Klotz said. “[For] all of these people to stand up and be as courageous as they are, to talk about it and come forward and speak publicly about it, that’s what’s most impressive from a human standpoint.”

‘The power of fear is immense’

As a writer, McAdam is familiar with narrative techniques. One such technique he noted during the pandemic was the widespread instilling of fear by public officials and the media.

“If you can scare people as a storyteller, you have them in the palm of your hand, and the power of fear is immense,” he said.

McAdam said this narrative of fear inspired him to write his chapter.

“If we had been told from the beginning by those who dictate our lives, or dictate our movements that we should be brave in the face of this disease, we should be brave in our dealings with others — how different this all would look,” he said.

According to McAdam, one of the “clearest and most meaningful” messages of bravery he experienced during the pandemic came at the Canadian trucker convoy when it reached the capital city of Ottawa, where he resides.

He said:

“After two years of being told that we couldn’t breathe near each other and that we had to fear each other in the name of protecting each other, [it was] a beautiful thing to actually hug a stranger, something that doesn’t happen in the normal course of life but was happening all over on Parliament Hill that day and for many days to come.”

McAdam said the event brought him a feeling of great joy and celebration.

“The bravery of the convoy people was infectious to me. And since that point, I’ve wanted, at every turn, to speak out. Contributing to this book was one way to speak out,” he said.

Mainstream media medical experts ‘sounded like salesmen’

Rodney Palmer was a 20-plus-year veteran of Canadian mainstream media outlets, including national public broadcaster CBC. During the pandemic, he witnessed the “transition” of the CBC “from a public broadcaster that conducted news gathering, which I participated in, [to] a state broadcaster which conducts propaganda.”

Mirroring the title of his chapter, Palmer said that “the day journalism died” in Canada was when he witnessed longtime CBC journalist Adrienne Arsenault host what he described as a “Miss Manners segment about how to socially handle your father, should dumb old dad bring up at the family group chat that the virus came from a lab in China.”

Palmer, who covered the SARS outbreak for a year in China as the Beijing correspondent for CTV News, said he knew it would take months before the virus hunters would be able to determine the origin of the virus, particularly in China, where such investigations are “blocked every step of the way.”

“The icon of journalism in Canada, Adrienne Arsenault, was participating in propaganda, to convince Canadians of something that wasn’t true,” he said.

When Palmer listened to the doctors featured on CBC, they didn’t sound like doctors to him. “They sounded like salesmen” who “had corporate media training,” he said.

Palmer testified about mainstream media propaganda before Canada’s National Citizens’ Inquiry.

“I still don’t know necessarily who all was involved in this from the top down,” Palmer said. “I just know what I witnessed every day, and I felt it was important for me … to stand up and say what I know to be true.”

‘We needed a way to inform and educate and bring the truth out’

Dubé said his chapter was inspired by the experience of one of his close friends who was injured by a COVID-19 vaccine.

“One of my dear friends for 40 years took the shots unwillingly because his pay was being withheld, and he died full of clots with no comorbidities. He had the constitution of a bull and was just full of clots,” Dubé said.

“And many of us have had similar experiences, and that’s why I started, that’s why I continued, and that’s why we continue to be a voice,” he said.

“All of us had friends and relatives that were literally falling by the wayside, that were suffering, that were dying [on account of] listening to what was being put out there,” Dubé added.

Countering mainstream media and government narratives became a critical goal for Dubé. He said:

“We needed a way to inform and educate and bring the truth out. We needed to counter statements like ‘safe and effective’ and ‘two weeks to flatten the curve.’ None of us could sit by and let this happen. I truly felt that we had a moral obligation to use whatever talents, whatever platforms, whatever words we had to speak out.”

Dubé emphasized the role of “fact-checkers” in disseminating such narratives, describing them as “narrative enforcers” who were part of “a concerted effort” to promote “what was going to be effective in dealing with … the experimental gene therapy injections.”

“I truly hope that our experience as a planet with these injections and the propaganda surrounding [them] has somehow inoculated us against future attempts to manipulate and exploit,” he said.

“We have the moral authority … to speak out,” he said.

‘Mistakes were not made’

Alice said that her chapter came as a result of being censored.

“The irony is this chapter is actually my first Substack article, and it emerged from censorship,” she said. “Every time I tried to post a comment where I was exposing the propaganda … my comments or posts would just get ‘disappeared’ by the censorship fairies.”

This, according to Alice, was combined with “behavioral psychological techniques” such as nudging and “public opinion molding” — or the creation of made-for-media “pseudo-events.” These strategies were used to “engineer public opinion” and “control our perception of reality.”

Alice said that a silver lining of such censorship is that it brought her together with other like-minded individuals.

“The blessing of the censorship is that it caused me to find another platform where I was able to speak freely and more importantly, connect with all of these absolutely brilliant and amazing intelligent voices,” she said.

“We are trying to tell the story that mistakes were not made,” Alice said. “You do not have a globally coordinated propaganda campaign that just happens by accident.”

----------------------------------------------

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and part of the rotation of hosts for CHD.TV's "Good Morning CHD."

--------------------------------------------

Source

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/canary-in-a-covid-world-defender-podcast/