Monday, January 26, 2026

Everything you need to know about BlackRock, the company that owns the world

Everything you need to know about BlackRock, the company that owns the world

(LifeSiteNews) — BlackRock is one of the most powerful organizations in the world, and its nefarious role in global economics and politics is becoming more apparent.

The investment giant is pushing woke politics in the form of corporate social credit scores (ESG), which includes the dangerous “net zero” and LGBT agenda. BlackRock is also responsible for rigging the financial systems and has control over a significant portion of the world’s wealth.

In order to fight back, we need to know what we are dealing with. In this article, we take a deep dive into the history, current business practices, and plans of the globalist behemoth known as BlackRock.

The history of BlackRock and its founder

As of early 2022, BlackRock Inc. had around $10 trillion in assets under its management, making it the largest asset manager in the world. Blackrock holds a significant number of shares in most of the largest corporations in the world, including Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Tesla, Coca-Cola, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Exxon Mobil, Visa, Chevron, JPMorgan Chase, Walmart, and many more.

The company was founded 35 years ago, in 1988, by investment banker and current CEO Larry Fink as an affiliate organization of Blackstone Inc. It was originally named Blackstone Financial Management and grew rapidly within the first four years of its existence, reaching a portfolio of $17 billion by 1992, journalist James Corbett reported.

Since BlackRock had grown into a very respectable business, Fink and Stephen Schwarzman, the CEO of Blackstone, decided to separate BlackRock from Blackstone and make it into its own venture.

BlackRock went public in 1999 for $14 a share; the firm managed $165 billion in assets at this point. In the early 2000s, the company expanded its business to include analytics and risk management. It bought the investment management company State Street Research & Management in 2004, merged with the investment management firm Merrill Lynch in 2006, and acquired the Quellos Group’s key asset-management unit in 2007, bringing BlackRock’s total asset value under management to over $1 trillion.

While the financial success of BlackRock may seem impressive up until this point, what really turned the firm into the global financial dominator it is today was the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008. Journalist Heike Buchter, who wrote a book on BlackRock, said in 2015, “Prior to the financial crisis I was not even familiar with the name. But in the years after the Lehman [Brothers] collapse [in 2008], BlackRock appeared everywhere. Everywhere!”

Fink was trusted by these institutions as an expert on the financial instruments that led to the sub-prime mortgage crisis because he helped to create the toxic mortgage industry. In the 1980s, when Fink was still working for the investment bank First Boston, he constructed “his first Collateralized Mortgage Obligation (CMO) and almost single-handedly” created “the sub-prime mortgage market that would fail so spectacularly in 2008,” Corbett wrote.

“When the dust finally settled on Wall Street after the Lehman Brothers collapse, there was little doubt who was sitting on top of the dust pile: BlackRock,” Corbett said.

Under Fink’s leadership, BlackRock used its financial power and influence to move into national and international politics. Author and economic journalist F. William Endgahl put it this way:

BlackRock founder and CEO Larry Fink is clearly interested in buying influence globally. He made former German CDU MP Friederich Merz head of BlackRock Germany when it looked as if he might succeed Chancellor Merkel, and former British Chancellor of Exchequer George Osborne as ‘political consultant.’ Fink named former Hillary Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills to the BlackRock board when it seemed certain Hillary would soon be in the White House.

He has named former central bankers to his board and gone on to secure lucrative contracts with their former institutions. Stanley Fisher, former head of the Bank of Israel and also later Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve, is now Senior Adviser at BlackRock. Philipp Hildebrand, former Swiss National Bank president, is vice chairman at BlackRock, where he oversees the BlackRock Investment Institute. Jean Boivin, the former deputy governor of the Bank of Canada, is the global head of research at BlackRock’s investment institute.

You can clearly see the entanglement between BlackRock and the highest levels of politics and business and the immense global influence Fink’s investment firm therefore possesses. The corporation became so powerful that Professor William Birdthistle called it the “fourth branch of government.”

BlackRock in cahoots with the Biden administration

In 2019, when Joe Biden contemplated running for President against Donald Trump, the former vice president met with Fink to ask for BlackRock’s support. The CEO reportedly told Biden that “I’m here to help.”

Biden, seemingly quick to compensate BlackRock for its help, appointed Brian Deese as director of the National Economic Council soon after he became President. Before that, Deese was BlackRock’s Head of Sustainable Investing from 2017 until 2020. He also held several key positions in the Obama administration, including senior adviser to the president.

Another former BlackRock employee in the current Biden administration is Deputy Treasury Secretary Adewale Adeyemo, who served as senior adviser to Fink from 2017 until 2019. The Nigerian-born politician also has close ties to former President Barack Obama; he was chosen to be the first president of the Obama Foundation in 2019.

Moreover, former global chief investment strategist at BlackRock, Michael Pyle, is now the senior economic adviser to Vice President Kamala Harris. Pyle also served as a senior adviser to the Undersecretary of the Treasury for International Affairs in the Obama administration.

One may say that the Biden administration’s economic policy is essentially run by BlackRock.

BlackRock’s key role in the Great Reset and the COVID ‘pandemic’

Corbett argues that the COVID-19 “pandemic” was not mainly about a virus but rather represented an opportunity for global elites, particularly BlackRock, to reshape the global economy and the financial system.

On August 22, 2019, Fink officially joined forces with Klaus Schwab’s globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) when he became a member of the WEF’s Board of Trustees. On the same day, a meeting began of central bankers, economists, and policymakers to discuss economic policy – the annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium – where BlackRock kicked off its financial revolution.

One week before the event, BlackRock published a paper that would set the parameters of the discussion at the symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

“After years of quantitative easing (QE) and ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) and even the once-unthinkable NIRP (negative interest rate policy), the banksters were running out of room to operate,” Corbett explained.

So, the financial elites needed something new and BlackRock provided them with an answer: “Going direct.”

In order to understand the concept, one must first know that the monetary system is split into two circuits: the retail circuit and the wholesale circuit. The retail circuit is where “bank money” is spent, i.e. the money that regular people and businesses spent to transact in the economy. Then there is “reserve money” (wholesale circuit) which are the deposits that banks keep at central banks, like the Federal Reserve (Fed) or the European Central Bank (ECB).

For a more detailed explanation of the two monetary circuits, you can read my article on Central Bank Digital Currencies.

BlackRock’s proposal of “going direct” meant bypassing the split monetary system and letting central banks directly pump money into various private and public entities.

“An unprecedented response is needed when monetary policy is exhausted and fiscal policy alone is not enough,” BlackRock’s August 2019 paper stated. “That response will likely involve ‘going direct’: Going direct means the central bank finding ways to get central bank money directly in the hands of public and private sector spenders.”

In September 2019, months before the so-called “pandemic” began, Federal Reserve money started to be directly pumped into the retail monetary circuit.

Once the federal bailouts began with the first lockdowns in March 2020, the “going direct” system had already been put in place and the Fed could directly put money into private and public organizations.

“What we were told was a ‘pandemic’ was in fact, on the financial level, just an excuse for an absolutely unprecedented pumping of trillions of dollars from the Fed directly into the economy,” Corbett wrote.

In March 2020, similar to the financial crisis in 2007–2008, the Fed turned to BlackRock to manage its bailout programs.

This allowed BlackRock to get access to government, i.e. taxpayer, money, and distribute it to corporations that BlackRock was invested in and it enabled BlackRock to bail out one of its most important assets: iShares, the exchange traded funds (ETFs) collection, which as of January 2023 had $2.23 trillion worth of assets under management.

This means that BlackRock was allowed by the Fed to use taxpayer money to bail out its own assets. Russ and Pam Martens put it like this in their blog piece:

No bid contracts and buying up your own products, what could possibly be wrong with that? To make matters even more egregious, the stimulus bill known as the CARES Act set aside $454 billion of taxpayers’ money to eat the losses in the bail out programs set up by the Fed. A total of $75 billion has been allocated to eat losses in the corporate bond-buying programs being managed by BlackRock. Since BlackRock is allowed to buy up its own ETFs, this means that taxpayers will be eating losses that might otherwise accrue to billionaire Larry Fink’s company and investors.

In addition to the Fed, the Bank of Canada and the Swedish central bank also consulted BlackRock to help manage their corporate bond buying program.

With its 2020 “going direct” coup d’état, “BlackRock had truly conquered the planet,” Corbett wrote.

“It was now dictating central bank interventions and then acting in every conceivable role and in direct violation of conflict-of-interest rules, acting as consultant and advisor, as manager, as buyer, as seller and as investor with both the Fed and the very banks, corporations, pension funds and other entities it was bailing out.”

BlackRock’s all-powerful IT system

A significant portion of the value of all stocks and bonds in the world is managed through BlackRock’s “central processing system for investment management.”

This system, called Aladdin (abbreviation for “asset, liability, debt and derivative investment network”), is not only used by BlackRock itself.

BlackRock Solutions, one of BlackRock’s subsidiaries, licenses Aladdin to over 150 institutions, including the second largest asset manager in the world, Vanguard, and another giant of the industry: State Street Global Advisors. The system is also used by many of biggest insurance companies in the world and Big Tech firms such as Alphabet (Google), Apple, and Microsoft, as well as multiple pension funds.

Every day, Aladdin runs so-called “Monte Carlo simulations” – computer algorithms designed to model the probability of possible outcomes in systems that contain random variables – on all of the financial instruments under its management.

In 2017, Aladdin was risk-managing assets worth $20 trillion, the Financial Times reported. BlackRock has stopped reporting this figure since then, and it is likely much higher today.

In the past, the IT system was only used to calculate risk while the decisions were still made by humans. However, in 2017, Fink “threw his lot in with the machines” as BlackRock started to use an automated computer system called “Monarch” that took over the decision-making process for many of its assets.

In short, BlackRock’s Aladdin system manages well over $20 trillion worth of assets, which means that a considerable portion of the world’s wealth is dependent on calculations of a single computer system. Moreover, decisions to buy and sell stock are increasingly made by algorithms and AI instead of human beings.

Mistakes in the algorithms, whether they are deliberate or not, could therefore result in a disaster for the world economy.

The burning question that remains is what BlackRock plans to do with all the immense power and influence it acquired.

How BlackRock controls the world

“Behaviors are going to have to change and this is one thing that we are asking companies. You have to force behaviors and at BlackRock, we are forcing behaviors.”

This Larry Fink quote from 2017 summarizes what BlackRock is doing with its power and influence: forcing behaviors and shaping society in its image.

Fink’s yearly “letter to CEOs,” although it is officially not a directive, has been described as a “call to action” that changes the corporate behavior of many of the largest companies in the world. This was even confirmed by a peer-reviewed paper that concluded that “our evidence suggests that portfolio firms are responsive to BlackRock’s public engagement efforts.”

Fink has been using his influence over the corporate world to push the woke Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) agenda. ESG is essentially a kind of social credit system for corporations to make sure that they toe the line on destructive “net zero” carbon emission policies and various other items of the globalist agenda.

READ: DeSantis leads coalition of 19 governors to oppose ‘woke’ corporate ESG ideology

In his 2022 letter to CEOs, Fink wrote the following:

Sustainable investments have now reached $4 trillion. Actions and ambitions towards decarbonization have also increased. This is just the beginning – the tectonic shift towards sustainable investing is still accelerating. Whether it is capital being deployed into new ventures focused on energy innovation, or capital transferring from traditional indexes into more customized portfolios and products, we will see more money in motion.

Every company and every industry will be transformed by the transition to a net zero world. The question is, will you lead, or will you be led?

He also made it clear that BlackRock demands that corporations follow the “net zero” ESG agenda:

Stakeholder capitalism is all about delivering long-term, durable returns for shareholders. And transparency around your company’s planning for a net zero world is an important element of that. But it’s just one of many disclosures we and other investors ask companies to make. As stewards of our clients’ capital, we ask businesses to demonstrate how they’re going to deliver on their responsibility to shareholders, including through sound environmental, social, and governance practices and policies.

A low ESG “social credit” rating will prevent business from successfully operating, as journalist Iain Davis explains:

This will be achieved using Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics. Assets will be rated using environmental, social and governance (ESG) benchmarks for sustainable business performance. Any business requiring market finance, perhaps through issuing climate bonds, or maybe green bonds for European ventures, will need those bonds to have a healthy ESG rating.

A low ESG rating will deter investors, preventing a project or business venture from getting off the ground. A high ESG rating will see investors rush to put their money in projects that are backed by international agreements.

BlackRock is not alone in pushing the net zero agenda. There are currently 301 signatories to “The Net Zero Asset Managers initiative” that combined have $59 trillion under management.

Naturally, BlackRock also promotes Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), as the complete digitization of payments would enable total control over all monetary exchanges and therefore make it even easier to enforce the ESG agenda.

In his 2022 letter to shareholders, Fink raved about the benefits of CBDCs like “reducing the risk of money laundering and corruption” and bringing “down costs of cross-border payments.”

It goes almost without saying that BlackRock also pushes the LGBT agenda by promoting the so-called Corporate Equality Index, which rates companies’ commitment to “LGBTQ-inclusive policies and practices.”  The index is published by the Human Rights Campaign, an organization funded by George Soros’ Open Society Foundation.

Journalist James Corbett paints a bleak picture of the future that BlackRock envisions:

 The future of the world according to BlackRock is now coming fully into view. It is a world in which unaccountable computer learning algorithms automatically direct investments of the world’s largest institutions into the coffers of those who play ball with the demands of Fink and his fellow travellers. It is a world in which transactions will be increasingly digital, with every transaction being data mined for the financial benefit of the algorithmic overlords at BlackRock. And it is a world in which corporations that refuse to go along with the agenda will be ESG de-ranked into oblivion and individuals who present resistance will have their CBDC wallets shut off.

Hope for a better future

BlackRock may seem like an unstoppable force by now, but until recently the majority of the public had no idea who BlackRock even was or what they are doing. This is changing before our eyes.

The pushback against BlackRock and its agenda has been growing in recent years, with protests taking place at their New York and Paris offices.

Moreover, the nonprofit organization Consumers’ Research launched a campaign against BlackRock last year, criticizing the firm for its China connections.

“You’d think a company that has made it their mission to enforce ESG (environmental, social and governance) standards on American businesses would apply those same standards to foreign investments, but BlackRock isn’t pushing its woke agenda on China or Russia,” the executive director of Consumers’ Research said. “America’s consumers know a liar when they see one, and Consumers’ Research isn’t going to let them get away with it.”

The resistance from states governed by Republicans has also been growing. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently pulled $2 billion from BlackRock’s treasury fund. Louisiana and South Carolina have announced that they will withdraw state funds from BlackRock as well, and Arkansas has already taken $125 million out of accounts managed by BlackRock. DeSantis is also leading a coalition of 19 governors to oppose the woke corporate ESG agenda.

At the latest Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), a panel discussion was held titled “The New Axis of Evil: Soros, Schwab, and Fink,” which focused on the ability of wealthy elites, including BlackRock, to force far-left policies upon the United States and around the world.

By spreading information about BlackRock’s nefarious plans and actions, public opinion can change and Fink’s corporate behemoth will be put under pressure. The economic collapse that is likely to occur in the near future will have people looking for those responsible for the crisis – and BlackRock is certainly among the perpetrators. It remains to be seen whether or not BlackRock is going to be able to retain its power and influence now that it will be in the spotlight and public opinion is turning on them.

-------------------

Andreas Wailzer is an Austrian journalist based in Vienna writing for LifeSiteNews. He studied business and economics in Vienna and Vancouver, Canada. In 2022, he left his job in the corporate world to work full-time in the field of Catholic journalism and advocacy, first at the St. Boniface Institute in Vienna and now at LifeSiteNews.

Andreas loves to write about politics, economics, and everything related to the Catholic faith. His work has been published in English and German in multiple media outlets, including Die Tagespost, Wochenblick, Corrigenda, and LifeSiteNews.

-----------------------------

Source

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/everything-you-need-to-know-about-blackrock-the-company-that-owns-the-world/

Sunday, January 25, 2026

DHS: Here is a list of top COVID misinformation spreaders you should investigate ASAP

DHS: Here is a list of top COVID misinformation spreaders you should investigate ASAP

DHS is now going after COVID misinformation spreaders considering them terrorist threats. Here's my list of people I think they should be investigating.

DHS is getting tough on COVID misinformation spreaders, i.e., people who spread information that “undermines public trust in government institutions.”

Since DHS has finite resources to pursue all these perpetrators, as a public service, I have created a list of what I believe are some of the country’s top misinformation spreaders.

I sincerely hope that the DHS will focus their efforts on these individuals since they have made statements and/or taken actions (or refused to take action) that result in the undermining of public trust in US government institutions.

It is extremely easy to tell who is telling the truth here: it’s the people who are not afraid of debate. The one thing everyone on our list has in common is that they will never agree to debate anyone with opposing views.

These people need to be stopped now and I’m grateful that DHS is finally taking this seriously as innocent lives are being lost.

The DHS memo

Read this memo issued yesterday, Feb 7, entitled Summary of Terrorism Threat to the U.S. Homeland.

In particular, check this out this section:

Hmmm…I couldn't come up with any "violent extremist attacks during 2021" that were inspired by this alleged COVID-19 misinformation. Can you?

Kim Iverson did a fantastic video on the DHS memo and its significance.

To make their job easier to pursue these spreaders of COVID-19 misinformation, I’ve compiled a list of the Disinformation Dozen, the top spreaders of COVID disinformation that are literally killing people through spreading misinformation about COVID.

My Disinformation Dozen list

I believe that all of these people are involved in “The proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions” and have collectively led to the tragic death of over 1M Americans.

All of these people should be detained for questioning.

I’ve also provided a handy list of questions that none of them will be able to answer with satisfactory answers.

Note that the list is subjective. Different people will likely have different lists but most people would agree on the top five.

  1. President Joe Biden
    Told the public the vaccines were safe and effective even though the data said the opposite. Wore ineffective face masks in order to mislead the public into thinking these masks could protect them. Refused to meet with any qualified scientist or doctor with opposing viewpoints before and after mandating the vaccines. Deliberately refuses to meet with scientists with opposing viewpoints so continues to spread misinformation today. He tried to scare the unvaccinated by claiming the unvaccinated would experience a winter of severe illness and death. Continues to erode public trust in the office of the President with approval ratings that are at all time lows:

    Chart shows Biden’s job rating continues to slide among Democrats, Democratic leaners
  2. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky
    Told people the vaccines are safe and effective and that masks work. Withheld information about early treatment protocols.

  3. NIAID Director Anthony Fauci
    Funded the virus, covered it up, knowingly spread misinformation about the source of the virus, lied about it all in Congress when questioned by Senator Rand Paul, and told Cliff Lane to not approve any early treatments in the Guidelines.

  4. US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy
    Told people the vaccines are safe and effective and that masks work and said nothing about effective early treatment protocols. Compounded the error by labeling people trying to spread life-saving information as “disinformation” spreaders.

  5. Bill Gates
    Funded the misinformation campaigns (the fact checkers) including GAVI.

  6. FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock
    Said she would investigate the Maddie de Garay case that proved fraud in the Pfizer trial and then did nothing. The FDA also denied the EUA application on fluvoxamine, a drug later proven to reduce mortality by 12X in a large Phase 3 trial.

  7. COVID-19 Guidelines Chairman Cliff Lane
    Discredited every single working COVID early treatment including fluvoxamine which has a 12X reduction in fatalities. Ignored all COVID-19 early treatments that work.

  8. Tom Shimabukuro (CDC vaccine expert)
    Never mentioned the VAERS URF which underplayed the danger of the vaccines by at least 41x and deliberately misled people about causality and VAERS by claiming you can’t determine causality. Ignored all the safety signals in VAERS on all but a few symptoms. Ignored the death safety signal. Ignored every safety signal in DMED.

  9. John Su (CDC, VAERS expert)
    See Tom Shimabukuro

  10. Steven A. Anderson (FDA), the top vaccine safety official at the FDA
    Deliberately ignored all the VAERS and DMED safety signals and ignored all attempts to meet about the safety signals.

  11. Gavin Newsom, Governor of California
    Mandated vaccination in California even though he was injured by the COVID vaccine. Will not vaccinate his own kids. He knows the vaccines are dangerous from first-hand experience and deliberately misleads the people of California by claiming they are safe.

  12. Dr. Richard Pan, California State Senator
    Introduced legislation in the California legislature to close the Personal Exemption Loophole for COVID-19 School Vaccinations which will lead to the death of an unknown number of children. All done with no scientific evidence.

Top corporate spreaders of misinformation

These companies refuse to censor doctors and scientists who claim that the vaccines are safe and effective and masks work. Instead they actually compound the problem censor people who are telling the truth. Net result: hundreds of thousands of deaths caused by censoring the wrong people.

  1. YouTube

  2. Facebook

  3. Twitter

  4. LinkedIn

  5. Medium

  6. Nextdoor

  7. Wikipedia (they mislabel people telling the truth as misinformation spreaders and people believe it)

  8. All “fact checker” organizations

The actions of the Disinformation Dozen cost lives

Collectively, these people are responsible for the deaths of over 1M Americans.

For example, they have done things such as:

  1. Encouraging and/or mandating people to take “vaccines” that data shows are more likely to kill them than to save them. And even when people aren’t killed, the scientific evidence shows that these vaccines are making people more likely to be infected from the latest variant. This has led to the untimely death of an estimated 400,000 Americans and to the permanent disablement of a roughly equivalent number.

  2. Telling people to wear masks when they know full well that all of the randomized trials showed that masks were ineffective. By misleading people to think they were protected, people then ventured into dangerous situations believing they were protected when they were in fact not protected at all. Masks are not harmless interventions. IQ has dropped dramatically (22 points) due to this “harmless” intervention. DHS needs to stop these terrorists now inside the CDC who are promoting this.

  3. Ignoring all attempts to challenge them on their views by refusing to debate qualified scientists and doctors

  4. Spreading misinformation about the VAERS system by deliberately not calculating the underreporting factor using their own methodology and then not applying that in public statements, thus misleading the CDC and FDA outside committees into making erroneous decisions. Also ignoring all the safety data in the VAERS database and refusing to take any meetings to discuss it.

  5. Deliberately trying to censor doctors and scientists from spreading the truth that will save lives through intimidation tactics and directing social networks to cancel their accounts

  6. Sandbagging early treatment drugs that have been shown in clinical trials to save lives. They literally told people not to use these life-saving protocols leading to the unnecessary death of close to 900,000 people.

See Incriminating Evidence for details on all of the above points.

I believe they need to be silenced immediately before more harm is done.

See this article for more details but here’s the summary:

Toby’s list

This list was created by Dr. Toby Rogers.

The corporate kingpins trial docket

  1. Bill Gates (Gates Foundation)

  2. Julie Gerberding (Merck)

  3. Albert Bourla (Pfizer)

  4. Alex Gorsky (J&J)

  5. Stéphane Bancel (Moderna)

  6. Pascal Soriot (AstraZeneca)

  7. Kenneth Frazier (Merck)

  8. Emma Walmsley (GSK)

  9. Paul Hudson (Sanofi)

The institutional trial docket

  1. Tony Fauci (NIAID)

  2. Francis Collins (NIH)

  3. Peter Hotez (Baylor)

  4. Paul Offit (UPenn)

  5. Tedros Adhanom (WHO)

  6. Rochelle Walensky (CDC)

  7. Frank DeStefano (CDC)

  8. Tom Shimabukuro (CDC)

  9. Ezekiel Emanuel (UPenn)

  10. Michael Osterholm (Univ. MN)

  11. Neil Ferguson (Imperial College London)

  12. Dorit Reiss (UC)

The political trial docket

  1. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY)

  2. Phil Murphy (D-NJ)

  3. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI)

  4. Ned Lamont (D-CT)

  5. Gavin Newsom (D-CA)

  6. Thomas Frieden (D-NY)

  7. Tom Wolf (D-PA)

  8. Jay Inslee (D-WA)

  9. Kate Brown (D-OR)

  10. Janet Mills (D-ME)

  11. Tim Walz (D-MN)

  12. Ralph Northam (D-VA)

  13. Jared Polis (D-CO)

  14. Richard Pan (D-CA)

  15. Lorena Gonzales (D-CA)

  16. Brad Hoylman (D-NY)

  17. Kyle Mullica (D-CO)

  18. Justin Trudeau (Liberal Party, Canada)

The media trial docket

  1. Susan Wojcicki (YouTube)

  2. Sundar Pichai (Google)

  3. Mark Zuckerberg (Meta, Facebook, Instagram)

  4. Jack Dorsey (Twitter)

  5. Lisa Sherman (The Ad Council)

  6. Sanjay Gupta (CNN)

  7. Anderson Cooper (D-CNN)

  8. Rachel Maddow (MSNBC)

  9. Leana Wen (Wapo/CNN)

  10. Imran Ahmed (CCDH)

  11. Joe Smyser (Project VCTR)

  12. Brandy Zadrozny (NBC)

Honorable mention (inside US)

Not included in the lists above, but worthy of investigation. Not in any particular order.

  1. All state medical boards who investigated any physician for issuing waivers, speaking out against the vaccines or masks, or mandates, or prescribing live-saving drugs

  2. AMA

  3. IDSA

  4. Biden White House coronavirus response coordinator Jeff Zients and Biden's Chief of Staff Ron Klain

  5. Rick Bright, former head of BARDA who didn’t fund early treatment and sabotaged HCQ

  6. Robert Redfield, former CDC director

  7. Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough

  8. Chris Cuomo, Jeff Zucker and everyone else at CNN, ESPN, MSNBC

  9. CNN’s Jake Tapper who accuses RFK Jr of being a grifter, but will not accept an open debate. Seriously?

  10. Jen Psaki

  11. Sonia Sotomayor, US Supreme Court

  12. Kathy Hochul, Governor of NY

  13. Eric Topol (Scripps)

  14. Zubin Damania (aka Zdoggmd)

  15. Monica Gandhi (UCSF)

  16. “Ed” (if you read the comments to my posts, you’ll know who I’m talking about)

  17. Donald Trump (although he’s more recently spoken out against mandates, he has not spoken out against the vaccines themselves)

  18. Mike Pence

  19. Deborah Brix

  20. Vinay Prasad (even though he’s right on masks and calling out the misinformation on myocarditis, he’s wrong on vaccines and is costing lives)

  21. Nancy Pelosi

  22. Anna Eshoo

  23. Big Bird

  24. Other members of Congress (with the notable exception of Senator Ron Johnson who is heroic)

  25. Ralph Baric, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

  26. Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance, without whom we wouldn’t have a pandemic

  27. Jens Kuhn and Sina Bavari

  28. Most local officials within our towns/cities/municipalities who supported vaccine/mask mandates

  29. School Boards who supported vaccine/mask mandates

  30. Teachers unions

  31. Medical doctors who recommended the vaccines/masks, especially for kids and who ignored early treatment for their patients

  32. Hospitals who took the grift and complied with CDC directives and forbade the use of ivermectin and other life saving treatments

  33. Businesses who fired people who didn’t comply with vaccine mandates

  34. Churches who tell people to get vaccinated

  35. Governor Eric Holcomb (Indiana) as well as other governors pushing the narrative (Notable exception: Ron DeSantis)

  36. Mike DeWine (R - governor of Ohio). Multiple times said that vaccines were "100% effective." His current health director minion has flat out lied multiple times about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, particularly their safety data in kids.

  37. JB Pritzker, Governor of Illinois and Mayor Lori E. Lightfoot (Chicago)

  38. The Economist, Forbes, Reuters, Kamala Harris, NPR

  39. All legacy media (previously known as “mainstream media”)

  40. London Breed, Mayor of San Francisco

  41. Eric Feigl-Ding aka Dr. Dingleberry

  42. Federation of State Medical Boards who wrote to state medical boards and physicians saying that doctors who spread misinformation should have action taken against their licenses.

  43. Every hospital corporation CEO, COO, CFO and Administrator in the US and anywhere that there is $ incentive to eliminate patients for profit bonuses. Any doctors, nurses , and technicians who also gain under the table by murdering patients.

  44. American Academy of Pediatrics. They lobbied DC Council members to pass the DC Minor Consent Bill - before Covid so that 11 year olds could get GARDASIL without parental knowledge or permission - and are pushing Covid vaccines for kids

  45. Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, and Sharon Stone for spreading misinformation about vaccine safety, choosing censorship over scientific debate, and attempting to use intimidation tactics to silence Joe Rogan’s guests

  46. Spotify’s new “fact-based” COVID-19 hub

  47. Drs. Sara Cody and Bonnie Maldonado, Teachers’ Union in California, Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors who let Dr. Cody act dictatorially,

  48. All FDA and CDC outside committee members

  49. Admiral Rachel L. Levine, MD, Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH)

  50. LA Mayor Eric Garcetti

  51. The medical licensing board of Maine, who declared that Meryl Nass must undergo a psychiatric evaluation for prescribing IVM and HCQ, and if she doesn't it's "an admission of guilt." This is so fascistic and out of control it is jaw dropping.

  52. Joy Reid MSNBC & the “ladies” of the View

  53. Jerome Adams, former US Surgeon General

  54. Rob Davis, the current CEO of Merck

  55. Google (for skewing the search results, especially on “mass formation psychosis” which I caught on video)

  56. Fact checkers who work for legacy media company or standalone fact checker organizations (pretty much without exception. I have yet to run across an honest fact checker that works for legacy media.)

  57. All Hollywood types that did vaccine and booster commercials.

  58. Chelsea Clinton (who is on a mission to stamp out correct information about COVID-19). Here’s an excerpt from the article: Clinton emphasizes that parents who are wondering if they should vaccinate their kids need to be "trusting science and scientists and listening to your local pediatrician." Wow. Forget about the evidence. Do whatever the “experts” say. Chelsea is a huge part of the problem.

  59. All the people mentioned in RFK’s book who helped Fauci

  60. Katelyn Jetelina aka Your Local Epidemiologist

  61. Jessica Malaty Rivera (who claims to want to stop COVID misinformation but refuses to debate them)

  62. Rockefeller Foundation (for supporting people like Jessica Malaty Rivera who spread misinformation)

  63. Oregon Health Authority...and all hospital administrators

Honorable mention (outside US)

  1. Klaus Schwab

  2. Pope Francis (who called for wide scale vaccination)

  3. Canada

    1. Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada's Chief Medical officer

    2. Bonny Henry, British Columbia's "Top Doc",

    3. Eileen DeVilla, Medical Officer of Health for the City of Toronto

    4. All the public health officers in the provincial and municipal governments, plus all the federal and provincial ministers of health in Canada

    5. All of the Canadian legacy media, especially CBC

    6. All lawmakers wearing masks

  4. Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand

  5. Germany

    1. Angela Merkel,

    2. Olaf Scholz,

    3. Karl Lauterbach,

    4. Christian Drosten

  6. Dr. Zhengli Shi

  7. New Zealand

    1. Ashley Bloomfield (Director General of Health - NZ),

    2. Chris Hipkins (Covid Response Minister - NZ Labour Party)

  8. Sebastian Kurz, former Chancellor of Austria

  9. People in Australia:

    1. Scott Morrison (PM)

    2. Daniel Andrews (Victoria Premier)

    3. Annastacia Pałaszczuk (QLD Premier)

    4. Gladys Berejiklian (former NSW Premier)

    5. Kerry Chant (NSW Chief Health Officer)

    6. Brad Hazzard (NSW Minister of Health)

    7. Mark McGowan (WA Premier) [check out West Australia Nazi-Like Police State Run By A Thug Named Mark McGowan]

    8. Michael Gunner (Chief Minister of the Northern Territory)

  10. WHO doctors who approved the vaccines

Who did I miss that deserves to be mentioned? Let me know in the comments.

The above is not a complete list

But is a “good start.” See more ideas in the comments.

Want to appeal your inclusion in the list above

We are happy to hear any appeals from anyone listed above if you believe that you have been unfairly categorized. See this article:

Steve Kirsch's newsletter
Your opportunity to correct the "misinformation spreaders"
I don’t think that misinformation censorship policies regarding COVID are a good idea. This leaves determining the “truth” in the hands of people who, for the most part, do not fully understand the issues or who are not qualified to render a judgment…
Read more

We believe that it is important not to censor misinformation, but to discuss it and inform the public by allowing the public to hear both sides of the story. We realize that nobody on our list above shares our point of view.

Enormous credit to those who do not comply

Perhaps in a future article, I can list those who should be acknowledged for not complying such as:

  1. First responders everywhere who got fired rather than take the jabs

  2. Doctors and pharmacists who did treat patients, who did fill prescriptions, and who did try, especially those who spoke out publicly

  3. Doctors who risked their careers to write medical exemptions

  4. Canadian Truckers

  5. US Senator Ron Johnson

  6. Everyone who has been labelled a spreader of misinformation

  7. JP Sears

  8. Ottawa police who demanded and received an exemption to vaccination

  9. … and many many more

Please share this with your networks

It’s important people know who to avoid listening to.


Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Thousands of paid subscribers
I've written over 1,700 articles about COVID, vaccines, corruption, censorship, and early treatments. The data shows that the COVID vaccines have no benefit and have killed over 500,000 Americans. The data is publicly available, but nobody wants to look.
---------------------------
Source

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/dhs-here-is-a-list-of-top-covid-misinformation

Everything you need to know about BlackRock, the company that owns the world

Everything you need to know about BlackRock, the company that owns the world The giant investment company's global influence on politics...