US Leadership Wreaks Mayhem and Destruction Across the World

US Leadership Wreaks Mayhem and Destruction Across the World

By Vasko Kohlmayer

October 28, 2023

“US leadership holds the world together,” declared Joe Biden in a recent televised address to the nation.

Of all the untruths that Joe Biden has uttered in his term as president this one is perhaps the most egregious. It is enough to look at the past two decades to see just how wrong President Biden’s claim is.

Instead of holding the world together, America’s political leadership has, in fact, inflicted wholesale chaos, death, and destruction in many places across the globe. It has attacked and invaded sovereign nations, shattered societies, created instability and caused the deaths of millions.

The War on Terror

Examples abound. Afghanistan and Iraq are a good start. After spending years and trillions of dollars to pummel these two nations into submission we left them in complete disarray.

Who can forget our infamous exit from Kabul in August of 2021 with desperate Afghanis hanging on the wings of the departing planes?

It is worth reminding ourselves who took over after we unceremoniously departed that long-tried nation. It was the Taliban: the same bad guys we set out to chase away 20 years previously.

Not only did they march into Kabul to again lord it over the Afghani people, but we left them some seven billions dollars’ worth of military equipment. Even CNN has noticed the irony and tragedy of the whole Afghani enterprise:

“This equipment is now in a country that is controlled by the very enemy the US was trying to drive out over the past two decades: the Taliban.”

This was, by the way, the greatest loss of military hardware by any country in history.

And what was the first thing the Taliban did after happily ensconcing themselves in Kabul’s presidential palace?

They began slaughtering those Afghanis who had co-operated with the American occupiers. The Taliban were killing people across the land and staged public executions to make an example of the collaborators. We went into Afghanistan with promises of liberation and democracy, and it ended with a slaughter as innocent blood ran down the streets.

A recent poll found that the majority of Americans agree that the war in Afghanistan was not worth it. From a report in the Navy Times:

“Two-thirds of Americans say the war in Afghanistan was not worth fighting; 65% of Democrats and 63% of Republicans agree on that evaluation.”

Paradoxically, the Afghanistan misadventure is one of the very few issues on which Democrats and Republicans see eye to eye. The piece continues:

“Polls suggest the withdrawal, seen by many as chaotic and ill-planned, may have been a turning point for President Joe Biden’s approval ratings, which started a downward slide around that time and have not recovered since.”

Joe Biden was, of course, deeply involved with the war in Afghanistan. First in his capacity as the head of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and later for eight years as vice-president of the United States in the Obama administration.

And what about Iraq, a sovereign country that we invaded under false pretenses?

Our leaders accused Saddam Hussein of manufacturing weapons of mass destruction and also hinted he may have been involved in the terror of 9/11. So much so that at the time of the invasion seventy percent of the American public believed that Saddam had a hand in the downing of the Twin Towers. The 9/11 Commission found, however, that this was not the case and that the claim of Saddam – Al-Qaeda connection was just a conspiracy theory.

And as for Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction? All that was found was a row of canisters of expired rat poison in the basement of the Iraqi department of defense.

Instead of apologizing for invading a country on the basis of a lie and making appropriate reparations, we continued the occupation and had Saddam executed even though he was innocent of the accusations we had originally levelled against him.

Our invasion – which cost more than four thousand American soldiers and at least three trillion dollars – wrought widespread chaos throughout the Iraqi society. According to a 2008 survey more than one million of Iraqis died as a result of the conflict that we unleashed.

Needless to say, we left Iraq in a worse condition than it was before we came into it. In fact, the chaos that we created helped to give rise to a ferocious terrorist group called the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria also known as ISIS. This we have on authority of no lesser figure than Tony Blair who admitted as much in October 2015.

[Full disclosure: This writer supported both wars, because he fell blindly for government propaganda. This mistake is a source of longstanding remorse. Although we cannot change the past, we can, however, resolve one thing: never again to fall for government agitprop.]

The destruction in Afghanistan and Iraq, however, are not the only two disasters that our government inflicted upon the world in the recent past. The list is quite long: Syria, Somalia, Libya, Yemen.

We involved ourselves in all these places and have left behind a trail of destruction, instability, death, suffering, and chaos.

And yet Joe Biden goes on TV to tell the American people that the US leadership is what holds this world together.

Ukraine

As if the US leadership was not doing enough damage already, it provoked another war – in Ukraine this time – by senselessly pushing for NATO’s sphere to the Russian border. This was a move that the Russians could not leave unanswered. They vehemently complained for years, warning and pleading with the US government to halt the process. But our leaders would not relent and in the end the Kremlin felt they had no choice.

Of one thing, we can be sure: Putin did not invade Ukraine, because he is mad or because he hates democracy. Claims such as these constitute a rank form of government propaganda akin to that of Saddam having weapons of mass destruction. Whatever he may be, Putin is not mad, and Ukraine is not democracy. Ukraine is the most corrupt country in Europe and one of the most corrupt places on earth.

Putin invaded Ukraine, because he objected to the US driven push for NATO’s eastward expansion whose aim was to bring that useless alliance all the way to Russia’s doorstep. No superpower would allow a hostile military block entrenching itself at its boundary in this manner. The last time this was tried – when the Soviet Union attempted to build military installation in Cuba – the United States made it clear it was ready to respond with nuclear force, and the Soviets withdrew.

Even though the pro-Biden regime propagandists tried hard to hide the true reason for Russia’s operation, the truth came out recently from none other than NATO Chief Jens Stoltenberg who admitted that NATO’s enlargement was the real reason for Moscow’s actions. He also inadvertently confessed that what Putin wanted was security and peace, and that he was prepared not to act if his request was met. This is what Stoltenberg said:

“The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that.”

It was a grave mistake by NATO not to sign the proposed treaty in the fall of 2021, not least because Putin’s demand was both sensible and justified.

For a long time, astute geopolitical analysists had been warning about the looming disaster in Ukraine. More than eight years ago, Professor John Mearsheimer, one of the best-known political scientists in the world, predicted that America’s push for NATO’s eastward growth would eventually lead to disastrous outcomes. He explained the underlying dynamic in the now famous lecture which he delivered at the University of Chicago as far back as June of 2015. In that lecture, he accurately predicted Ukraine’s fate. This is what he said:

“The West is leading Ukraine down the primrose path, and the end result is that Ukraine is going to get wrecked.”

Anybody who cares about international affairs and the role played in it by the United States should take an hour to listen to his lecture.

In retrospect, Professor Mearsheimer’s talk is very important for the following reason: if the astute professor was able to predict the destruction of Ukraine with such uncanny accuracy, it means that the analytical framework he used to arrive at this prediction must have been correct. Based on that framework, it is clear that the West, led by the United States, is at fault here.

Another superb analysis of the Ukraine fiasco has been given in an essay authored by Professor Jeffrey Sachs titled “The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace.” This is what he writes about the real cause of the Ukraine conflict:

“There were in fact two main U.S. provocations. The first was the U.S. intention to expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia in order to surround Russia in the Black Sea region by NATO countries… The second was the U.S. role in installing a Russophobic regime in Ukraine by the violent overthrow of Ukraine’s pro-Russian President, Viktor Yanukovych, in February 2014. The shooting war in Ukraine began with Yanukovych’s overthrow nine years ago, not in February 2022 as the U.S. government, NATO, and the G7 leaders would have us believe.”

And what would be the solution to the dire situation in Ukraine? According to Professor Sachs, “the key to peace in Ukraine is through negotiations based on Ukraine’s neutrality and NATO non-enlargement.”

But this is precisely what the US leadership is unwilling to do. As Sachs noted in another piece:

“Russia has repeatedly tried negotiations: to try to forestall the eastward enlargement of NATO; to try to find suitable security arrangements with the US and Europe… In all cases, the US government disdained, ignored, or blocked these attempts, often putting forward the big lie that Russia rather than the US rejects negotiations.”

The fruit of our involvement in Ukraine is very similar to that of our other geopolitical projects: wholesale mayhem, death and chaos. What, however, makes the Ukraine situation especially eggregious is the fact that by provoking a military superpower our leadership has brought the world to the brink of a nuclear war.

China

With their appetite for destruction still unsatiated, the US leadership are doing their best to start yet another war with a nuclear nation. As you may know, for several years now the US has been aggressively encircling China with its military bases and installations. “US secures deal on Philippines bases to complete arc around China,” tells us the headline of a BBC News article from February of this year. From that piece we learn that:

“With the deal, Washington has stitched the gap in the arc of US alliances stretching from South Korea and Japan in the north to Australia in the south.”

US navy ships now routinely patrol the waters within a few hundred miles of China’s mainland. How would we feel if China was doing the same to us? We would, of course, not allow anything of the kind.

Continually provoking China in its own neighborhood, it is truly astonishing that the US government keeps accusing China of aggressive posturing. This mirrors the situation in Ukraine where the US was pushing its alliances, military assets, and biological laboratories close to the Russian border and when Russia responded it was accused of aggression.

It is our leaders who are pursuing a policy of extreme aggressiveness. It is this aggressiveness that has manifested itself in the unprovoked and disastrous invasion of Iraq and the unprovoked bombing of at least eight countries as part of the so-called war on terror. What our leadership waged is not a war on terror but a war of terror upon different parts of the world.

Unbelievably, they now want to launch another war against the various terror groups throughout the Middle East and for good measure they threaten to bomb Iran as well. This they desire to do even though Iran has not attacked us in any way. This would be another unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation by the US government. If this happens, we can be quite sure that nuclear-armed Russia and China are not going to stand idly by.

It is imperative that now more than ever we do everything we can to stop our war-mad leaders from wreaking further geopolitical mayhem before they manage to destroy the planet and civilization by plunging the world into a nuclear Armageddon.

Covid-19

But ill-conceived and catastrophic geopolitical projects are not the only way through which the US leadership has been pushing the world into an ever-increasing state of chaos. Now it is almost certain that the US government has had a hand in the creation of SARS-CoV-2 virus by participating in gain-of-function research at the Wuhan laboratories in China.

The person overseeing this research from the American side was apparently one Anthony Fauci, the former head of the National Institutes of Health. One of the ways in which Fauci funneled US government money into the project was through EcoHealth Alliance, an outfit led by his good friend professor Peter Daszak. It goes without saying that such research is illegal both under American and international law.

Once the virus escaped, Fauci frenetically sought to cover his tracks by insisting that the virus originated in a local wet market rather than in the massive laboratory complex next door. He strongarmed other scientists into publicly denying the lab origin hypothesis and worked behind the scenes to make it a cancellable offense to suggest otherwise.

We all well remember what a scourge COVID-19 turned out to be. It was the greatest calamity to befall the world since WW2. The virus itself as well as the lockdowns and other extreme measures implemented by governments across the planet in response to it took unprecedented economic and human toll.

Is this what Joe Biden means by US leadership holding the world together?

But our leadership was still not done with the Covid damage. First, American health authorities suppressed effective treatment protocols so that they could obtain emergency use authorization for the experimental Covid vaccines. Once again, it was Fauci who was instrumental in that effort. The denial of effective treatment cost many lives, especially among the vulnerable demographics.

The American government then approved the hastily developed and insufficiently tested Covid vaccines and subsequently it did its best to force them on the population via various mandates. Much of the rest of the world followed the suit and those who refused were vilified and penalized by the US-led global establishment.

In the end the Covid shots proved both ineffective in stopping/preventing Covid and harmful, but not before the vaccinators managed to inject nearly two thirds of the world’s population with these substances in what constitutes perhaps the greatest crime against humanity in history.

You are wrong, President Biden: the US leadership does not hold the world together. We cannot but observe with great distress and sadness that many of the actions by the US government have proved detrimental to the well-being of the world and now its continual belligerency threatens to burn it down completely in a nuclear holocaust.

We urge you to change course and start doing what is good and right by honest dealing and by seeking peace. You should do this both for the benefit of the American people as well as for the rest of mankind.

---------------------------------------------

Vasko Kohlmayer (email) was born and grew up in former communist Czechoslovakia. You can follow his writings by subscribing to his Substack newsletter ’Notes from the Twilight Zone’. He is the author of The West in Crisis: Civilizations and Their Death Drives.

-----------------------------------------------

Source

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/vasko-kohlmayer/us-leadership-wreaks-mayhem-and-destruction-across-the-world/

A Short History of Bioweapons: Excerpts From RFK Jr.’s New Book, ‘The Wuhan Cover-Up

A Short History of Bioweapons: Excerpts From RFK Jr.’s New Book, ‘The Wuhan Cover-Up'

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., November 27, 2023

Below are excerpts from Chapter 3 and Chapter 7 of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s latest book, “The Wuhan Cover-Up: And the Terrifying Bioweapons Arms Race.” The book, which details how a cartel of run-amok military, intelligence, public health, biopharmaceutical, tech and media interests successfully positioned biosecurity at the forefront of U.S. foreign policy, is available for pre-order and will ship on Dec. 5.

In his definitive chronicle of Japan’s biowarfare program, [Hal] Gold recounts how Japan’s charismatic surgeon general, Shirō Ishii, hijacked Japan’s blue-chip medical proficiencies, civilian physicians, medical journals and universities, diverting them to serve the so-called “death sciences” of weapons development.

Following the bioweapons culture’s affinity for innocuous euphemisms to disguise sinister purpose, Japan’s biowarfare division adopted the Orwellian title “Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification Department.”

The more accurate description of Unit 731’s principal proficiencies were poisoning water and causing epidemics.

Unit 731’s diabolical Commander Ishii made himself Japan’s version of Germany’s “Angel of Death,” Dr. Josef Mengele, and transformed occupied Manchuria into a nightmarish bioweapons hellhole during the Sino-Japanese War.

Unit 731 operated 4,500 incubators in Manchuria for breeding plague-infected fleas on rats and mice to disseminate various contagions. Back on the home front, Ishii’s Unit recruited Japanese farmers, soldiers, and youth corps members across Japan to capture and breed rats, and elderly men to ranch fleas on their bodies.

Detachment 731 researchers also used sick dogs to cultivate and spread cholera and ticks to spread hemorrhagic fever and poisoned wells with cholera.

Ishii field-tested bacteriological weapons by aerial dousings of civilian populations in occupied Chinese cities and towns. Ishii proved the efficacy of entomological weapons during highly successful plague attacks on Manchuria’s port city of Ningbo in October 1940, Unit 731 dropped ceramic barrels filled with plague-laden fleas. Within days, residents were dying in droves.

The physicians of Unit 731 moved in with stretchers, pretending to offer treatment — but instead, removed the patients to field laboratories disguised as treatment centers and dissected them alive. Buoyed by the successful massacre at Ningbo, the Japanese dropped germ bombs carrying typhoid and cholera on over seventy Chinese communities — including eleven major cities — killing approximately five hundred thousand civilians.

Dr. Friedrich Frischknecht, professor of Integrative Parasitology at Heidelberg University and the Department of Parasitology at the Institut Pasteur, observed that the casualties mounted after cessation of hostilities: “Some of the epidemics they caused persisted for years and continued to kill more than 30,000 people in 1947, long after the Japanese surrendered.”

The “Special Handling” unit of Japan’s feared elite intelligence agency, the Kenpeitai, functioned as Unit 731’s “Human Materials Procurement Unit.” At night, the Kenpeitai raided city streets and emptied jails across occupied Manchuria to conscript “volunteers” for bioweapons experiments. The recruiters bound these prisoners’ arms and hips, and shipped them in boxcars to a walled city of 150 buildings housing thousands of test subjects on a six-square-kilometer proving ground in a remote village, Pingfang, in the Harbin district.

The compound included a camp for prisoners of war called the Zhongma Prison Camp. The involuntary subjects, according to Japanese sources, “were mostly Chinese prisoners, some Russians and, as one Japanese participant put it, some miscellaneous ‘half-breeds.’”

After the war, Moscow reported that Unit 731 also used American war prisoners as guinea pigs. Eyewitnesses reported viewing the bodies of deceased American servicemen preserved in large pickle jars, beside soldiers and civilians of diverse nationalities, on display in the specimen room of Unit 731’s massive headquarters in Pingfang.

The Japanese biowarfare units took special care to keep their trial subjects able-bodied and well-fed, since experiments sought to test efficacy of deadly germs on healthy populations.

Healthy subjects

Nazi doctors also demanded healthy subjects for their experimentation. On November 15, 1943, for example, German virus expert and vaccine creator Dr. Eugen Haagen, a key developer in the covert Nazi bioweapons program, sent a scolding letter to a university administrator complaining that of the one hundred prisoners sent to his lab in a recent delivery, eighteen had died in transport and only twelve were “in a condition suitable for my experiments.”

He requested “another 100 prisoners, between twenty and forty years of age, who are healthy and in a physical condition comparable to soldiers. Heil Hitler.”

In Japan, healthy, plump Chinese, Manchurian, and Russian guinea pigs — men, women, children, and infant civilians — awaited death in 1,000 cages from where they would, when ordered, extend their arms into adjacent corridors to receive inoculations from syringes filled with teeming pathogens administered by roving squads of physicians and scientists.

The injections included a long menu of infectious diseases with weapons potential: bubonic plague, anthrax, cholera, gangrene, typhoid, tuberculosis, syphilis, gonorrhea, dysentery, smallpox, and botulism.

A few hours — or perhaps days — later, an extraction team would bind these subjects to surgery tables, stuff towels in their mouths to suppress screams, dissect them alive, and harvest their organs for further study.

The pace of research kept three incinerators in operation to eliminate eviscerated bodies, with chemical baths waiting to destroy charred bone fragments. There were no survivors. The military liquidated every single patient utilized in research.

Following Japan’s surrender, Shirō Ishii presided over the massacre of the few surviving prisoners and razed the facility to destroy evidence of the atrocities prior to the arrival of Russian forces. As many as ten thousand subjects died in the camps, with three thousand killed during experimentation and live vivisections.

The Japanese occupiers told local Chinese and ethnic Russian Manchurians that the vast industrial complex that suddenly appeared in rural Pingfang was a lumber factory. In a dark joke, the human subjects became “logs.”

In controlled open-air experiments, physicians and their assistants tied Russian and Chinese men, children, and women — often with their infants — to stakes in open fields. Ishii’s men would then detonate flea-laden bug bombs. After waiting the four days needed for bubonic plague — or some other deadly contagion — to incubate in the bodies of these “logs,” the civilian physicians dissected their victims alive at various stages of infection to observe the living viscera before harvesting organs for shipment to medical schools and pharmaceutical companies.

In addition to injecting test subjects with lethal pathogens, Japanese researchers — mainly civilian physicians from Japan’s most prominent medical schools — killed “logs” with dehydration, poison, and starvation, or in sadistic amputation experiments similar to experiments Dr. Mengele and his henchmen were conducting in Germany.

Some five thousand miles distant from each other, German and Japanese doctors froze men, women, and infants to death in ice water, or outdoors during the subzero Manchurian and Eastern European winters, to study frostbite. They froze the limbs of living “volunteers” in special freezers until their bones shattered and the flesh dropped off.

Japanese doctors gassed prisoners with a wide variety of toxic vapors outdoors and in enclosures, and forced men infected with venereal diseases to rape female prisoners before performing living vivisections on both parties.

Physicians at Unit 731’s Harbin laboratory shipped the extracted body parts by plane to Ishii’s Epidemic Prevention Research Laboratory in Tokyo for distribution to academic and research institutions and pharmaceutical companies throughout Japan.

The arrangement allowed civilian physicians, researchers, and scholars to study hemorrhagic fever, bubonic plague, cholera, and other diseases that did not exist in Japan. The resultant research by thousands of Japan’s leading university physicians and professors kept Japan at the forefront of infectious disease expertise globally.

Ishii’s fleet of organ transport planes returned to Manchuria from Tokyo loaded with hundreds of thousands of rats for ranching the fleas that would fill the ceramic bug bombs with which Dr. Ishii delivered weaponized bubonic plague, hemorrhagic fever, and cholera.

To further embroil Japan’s major medical schools and academic research institutes, Ishii recruited thousands of professors and PhD students — “the brightest minds from Japan” — who flocked to Ishii’s Manchurian death camp to take advantage of unique research opportunities and for career advancement.

Just as many Americans now revere Anthony Fauci, wartime Japanese lauded Ishii’s Epidemic Prevention Unit as the global apex of cutting-edge science and Ishii as a medical deity.

Ishii’s rarified status made it easy to recruit the most promising medical students and preeminent Japanese medical and scientific authorities into the dark enterprise. Like Anthony Fauci, the government allowed Ishii to collect royalties on technologies that he developed while performing his duties. Ishii became wealthy from sales of his water purification device to private companies and the Japanese military.

Ishii explicitly exhorted Japan’s leading doctors to abandon the physicians’ traditional ethical codes:

Our God-given mission as doctors is to challenge all varieties of disease-causing micro-organisms; to block all roads of intrusion into the human body; to annihilate all foreign matter resident in our bodies; and to devise the most expeditious treatment possible. However, the research work upon which we are now about to embark is the complete opposite of these principles, and may cause us some anguish as doctors. Nevertheless, I beseech you to pursue this research, based on the dual thrill of 1) a scientist to exert efforts in probing for the truth in natural science and research into, and discovery of, the unknown world and 2) as a military person, to successfully build a powerful military weapon against the enemy.

Some twenty thousand physicians, researchers, and workers took part in Ishii’s bioweapons research project. Only a small percentage of Unit 731’s research staff were active military. Most were civilian physicians and researchers from academia.

In this way, Unit 731 co-opted the bulk of Japan’s medical community — civilian, military, and academic — away from healing and into weapons production and the death sciences, and implicated them in criminal atrocities, including human experimentation and bioweapons development.

Virtually all the Japanese doctors involved in Ishii’s research were aware of the savage brutality of Ishii’s human experimentation, Dr. Ishii and Japanese military instructed physicians and nurses, police and youth squad helpers to keep mum about their dirty work and to tell the world that they were developing vaccines. And they obeyed.

Gold notes that Ishii and the army of academic scientists used “aggressive salesmanship” to persuade the public and the world that they were engaged in defensive bioweapons and vaccine development — the same propaganda strategy that the American biosecurity cartel and its modern czar, Anthony Fauci, later adopted.

But Gold points out that “it seems clear that there was nothing defensive about Unit 731. The only thing remotely defensive about it was [the] strident tone of the argument with which Ishii justified its existence.”

Academics also conspired with the leading Japanese medical journals to mask their scholarly papers under pretense of vaccine development, epidemic prevention, and defensive biowarfare. Japanese academies used the term “monkeys” — without a species designation — in their published scientific papers as a euphemism for human subjects who were sacrificed during the experiment. Professor Tsuneishi Keiichi explained this ruse:

Failure to identify the species of an animal in an experiment lowers the value of the paper reporting its results. Where monkeys were actually used, it was common practice to identify the type. Thus, it was an open secret that the simple and unscientific use of the term “monkey” by itself was a code which meant that the subjects were human. The medical community knew this. The journal knew this. The readiness with which [Lieutenant General Kitano Masaji] publicized this transparent sham — and its acceptance by Japan’s medical community at large — is a sad testament to the lack of conflict between the ethical standards of the medical world in Japan and those of Unit 731.

Every medical school, regulatory agency, medical bureaucracy, medical journal, and virtually every research physician in Japan became complicit in the atrocities. The omertà [Mafia’s code of silence] by the Japanese medical professionals was strikingly similar to the Third Reich’s human experimentation.

In his book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, William Shirer points out that virtually every physician in Germany complied with the program and there is no record of a single complaint by a physician or medical association.

Although the “experiments” were conducted by fewer than two hundred murderous quacks — albeit some of them held eminent posts in the medical world — their criminal work was known to thousands of leading physicians of the Reich, not a single one of whom, so far as the record shows, ever uttered the slightest public protest.

Furthermore, Hitler’s government adopted policies to systematically eliminate physically handicapped and intellectually disabled subgroups — the so-called “useless eaters.” German law required doctors to identify all of their patients who were eligible for this program. Germany’s doctors complied, generally with enthusiasm. These programs implicated Germany’s leading physicians, medical institutes, and individual doctors as collaborators in Nazi atrocities.

As in Japan, the Reich’s bioweapons effort succeeded in recruiting the nation’s most illustrious and respected medical luminaries. Among those bioweaponeers who enjoyed international renown before Hitler’s rise to power were Germany’s Surgeon General Walter Schreiber, who supervised the Reich’s vaccine research; Deputy Surgeon General Dr. Kurt Blome, who directed bioweapons development; and Dr. Eugen Haagen, a key developer of Hitler’s biowarfare program.

While working for the Rockefeller Foundation in New Jersey in 1932, Haagen helped develop the yellow fever vaccine, an accomplishment that made him a contender for the Nobel Prize in 1937. Five years later, he was conducting deadly vaccine experiments on humans under Heinrich Himmler.

Marveling at these doctors’ dramatic metamorphosis from healing to homicide, Annie Jacobsen, author of Operation Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program That Brought Nazi Scientists to America, asks if “Nazi science . . . made monsters of these men?” The broad collapse of medical ethics among the entire generation of war-era Japanese and German physicians presaged parallel lapses among US and European doctors involved with bioweapons research and “defensive” vaccine research.

The COVID pandemic exposed this troubling phenomenon to the public eye, raising disturbing questions about the tendency of bioweapons and associated vaccine research to turn moral medical professionals into sociopaths.

A dark profession

One of the costs of engaging in a bioweapons arms race is the moral damage to the entire society as medicine and its practitioners turn away from health and against humanity. Perhaps the most enduring legacy of Ishii and the Nazi doctors is the indelible imprint of their moral myopia on the US bioweapons and vaccine programs.

As I show in The Real Anthony Fauci and as many Americans learned during the COVID pandemic, once doctors stop practicing medicine and become agents of state policy, it’s inevitable that the government will quickly make them instruments of social control. Doctors who pursue the lure invariably betray their deeply held values and often become the enemies of their own patients and humanity at large.

Ishii, Schreiber, and the others demonstrated how the rubric of “national security” can override even the most sacred moral precepts upon which a society rests — including the moral prohibitions against human experimentation and the wholesale murder of noncombatants, innocent civilians, and vulnerable minorities “for the greater good.”

In every nation that devoted resources to the field, the bioweapons enterprise has caused the wholesale subversion of traditional ethics across the medical profession. One of the most striking and consistent features of “biosecurity” is its tendency to divert national medical establishments from their ethical credo and to transform competent medical doctors and regulators who have previously committed their lives to healing disease and saving lives into dark necromancers, mass murderers, and diabolical enthusiasts for ghoulish human experimentation.

Like Ishii and Schreiber, Dr. Fauci rose to run an all-powerful bureaucracy and to enjoy vast political power and a deified national reputation. As did Schreiber and Ishii, the NIAID chief has given overriding priority to industry profits and the military applications of infectious disease research in ways that inevitably subverted his agency’s public health program.

Like Ishii and Schreiber, Dr. Fauci masks his bioweapons research behind the veil of vaccine development and the smokescreen of national security. Like them, he has mastered the mechanisms for controlling the medical journals and the mainstream press, co-opting the leading academics and medical associations, and made the nation’s most prominent scientists, doctors, and medical schools complicit in serious wrongdoing. He has advanced national security concerns to drown out ethical precepts against human experimentation and population-wide experiments.

Like them, he launched a world-wide search for pathogens with weapons potential under the masquerade of pandemic prevention.

And like them, when the jig was up, he engaged in elaborate efforts to escape blame or accountability for his experiments gone wrong.

---------------------------------------

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is on leave as the founder, chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children’s Health Defense. He was the founder of Waterkeeper Alliance — the world’s largest clean water advocacy group — and served as its longtime chairman and attorney.

----------------------------------------

Source

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rfk-jr-wuhan-cover-up-bioweapons-arms-race-book/

Covid Vaccines: The Great Travesty Against Mankind

Covid Vaccines: The Great Travesty Against Mankind

By Vasko Kohlmayer

October 21, 2023

“More than 5.55 billion people worldwide have received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, equal to about 72.3 percent of the world population,” observed the New York Times in March of this year.

In other words, in the space of twenty-seven months (since the beginning of the rollout), the vaccinators had managed to inject nearly two thirds of the world’s inhabitants with their COVID medicaments. Furthermore, the majority of the vaccinated were subjected to more than one dose. In total more than 13.5 billion injections were administered across the planet.

To pull this off in such a short period of time makes the COVID vaccination campaign one of the most impressive logistical and organizational feats ever accomplished.

A fatal flaw, however, has marred the whole COVID vaccination enterprise: it was a blatant fraud from beginning to end.

To begin with, the whole thing was based on a false premise. We were told that in SARS-CoV-2 we were up against a highly dangerous virus that posed a potentially lethal threat to those who contracted it and that vaccines were the only sure way to escape the scourge. This was a lie. For healthy people of productive age the infection fatality rate was about as high as that of the seasonal flu. For healthy children and young people the danger of a serious outcome was virtually nil.

Lauded as both “safe and effective,” the vaccines turned out to be anything but that. To begin with, it quickly became quite clear that the vaccines would not protect against infection. Only some five months after the start of the vaccination campaign, the authorities started speaking about the need for a booster. This obviously meant that the initial two doses of Pfizer and Moderna (one in the case of Johnson & Johnson) failed to protect their recipients from the SARS-CoV-2 virus beyond a very limited amount of time.

But the first booster also failed to confer any lasting protection and soon a second booster was required. The second booster, however, proved as ineffective as the first booster and a third booster was said to be necessary. But the third booster also failed, and a fourth booster was needed.

Currently, we are on the sixth shot and counting. And this less than 34 months after the COVID vaccines were first introduced. In other words, to keep fully vaccinated as per recommendations from our health authorities, one would have had to have been injected every five months or so.

But even those who got every booster on schedule were not protected against contracting COVID-19. We learn from the website of the Mayo Clinic: “People who are up to date on their vaccines can get breakthrough infections. They can then spread the virus to others.”

When pressed about this issue during a hearing of the European Parliament in October of last year, a Pfizer representative admitted that the company had never tested the vaccines to see whether they would prevent transmission.

What an astonishing admission that was. The objective of vaccines has always been to protect their recipients from the disease for which they were administered thus limiting the spread of infection in the population.

The COVID-19 “vaccines” are the first vaccines in history that do neither protect against infection nor slow its spread.

Do you remember when Joe Biden promised us during a Townhall meeting in 2021 that “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.”

Turns out this was a massive lie. It was brazen disinformation coming from the very top of the US government.

The majority of the injected came down with COVID and most of them more than once. In fact, it appears that getting “vaccinated” against COVID increases one’s chances of contracting COVID. Just ask Joe and Jill Biden who despite being jabbed multiple times have been repeatedly sickened with the disease.

We must ask ourselves, “What kind of vaccines are these?” Never has the world witnessed such a thing — vaccines that require a booster every few months and apparently make their recipients more likely to fall ill with the very disease against which they are supposed to protect.

Neither will the vaccines protect people from serious COVID outcomes. The majority of people who get serious COVID or die of COVID have been vaccinated. That the vaccines are grossly ineffective is becoming clear even to most of those who were previously brainwashed by our corrupt governments and medical authorities. A study published earlier this month found that “uptake of boosters has stalled in the United States at less than 20% of the eligible population.” Please note that the 20% uptake figure refers to only the eligible population. This means that only a small fraction of the whole population has opted to receive the COVID injections. Only 17% of Americans chose to receive the previous booster. This time around the number will be even lower. By now most people have seen through the fraud.

Not only are the vaccines ineffective, but they are also very dangerous. Since the rollout of the vaccination campaign, there has been an explosion of adverse reaction reports across the world. In the United States, the reports related to the COVID shots in the VAERS database exceed those related to all the other vaccines combined. There is no doubt that the COVID vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines ever devised and that by a long shot.

Already early in 2022, there were more than one thousand articles and studies published in scientific journals discussing the adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. Some of the effects listed include conditions such as pericarditis, myopericarditis, death, Guillain-Barre syndrome, acute venous thromboembolism, lymphadenopathy, acute thrombosis of the coronary tree, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, T-cell lymphoma, aphasia, and thrombophilia among others.

The wider public, however, was never informed about these studies by our government and the medical establishment, both of which are corrupted to the core.

According to a survey conducted by Rasmussen at the end of last year, nearly 30 percent of Americans thought they knew someone who had been killed by a COVID vaccine. This number is undoubtedly much higher today as we keep hearing the news of healthy people who keep inexplicably dying. The stories of hundreds of healthy athletes who have been collapsing and dying since the beginning of the vaccination campaign are especially revealing.

According to researcher Steve Kirsch the death rate of the COVID vaccines is roughly 1 in 1000 doses. This translates into 676,000 dead Americans. It turns out, however, that Kirsch’s analysis, which is based on a breakdown of VAERS figures, may be too conservative. Working with data from 17 countries on all-cause mortality, researchers with Canada-based Correlation Research in the Public Interest have come to the conclusion that the death rate of the COVID-19 shots is somewhere in the region of 1 in 800 doses. They estimate that the vaccines have killed some 17 million people worldwide.

As a point of comparison, the number of people exterminated by the Nazis in the Holocaust was about 6 million.

If even the most conservative estimates are correct, the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, the bulk of which was carried out under false pretences and coercive mandates, constitutes the greatest crime ever committed against humanity.

Unbelievably, so far no one — either in government or in the medical establishment — has been held responsible for this travesty.

----------------------------------------------

Vasko Kohlmayer (email) was born and grew up in former communist Czechoslovakia. You can follow his writings by subscribing to his Substack newsletter ’Notes from the Twilight Zone’. He is the author of The West in Crisis: Civilizations and Their Death Drives.

-----------------------------------------------

Source

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/vasko-kohlmayer/covid-vaccines-the-great-travesty-against-mankind/

Pandemics as a Catalyst for a New World Order

Pandemics as a Catalyst for a New World Order

Robert Malone, November 25, 2023

------------------------------------------------------

Each nation in the world has its own culture, governance structures, traditions, property, borders, and peoples. We must preserve the diversity and sovereignty of nations and cultures.

By globally synchronizing the public health response across the United Nations member states, new powers were granted to the UN and its organizations at the cost of national sovereignty. These universally applied regulations and multilateral agreements have given birth to an enlarged, globalized administrative state.

Although this power grab has been percolating for many decades, the Covid crisis acted as an accelerant to synergize international agreements that advance the UN as a world government.

The United Nations has morphed into a leviathan. Its various agreements and goals seek to centrally dictate the world’s economy, migration, “reproductive health,” monetary systems, digital IDs, environment, agriculture, wages, climate modifications, one world health, and other related globalist programs.

To be clear, these are the goals of an organization seeking a globalized command economy, not an organization focused on world peace, ending wars, or human rights!

This UN aims to regulate every dimension of our personal and national lives. It is working to reduce and eliminate national sovereignty across the world, and thereby to decrease our diversity, our traditions, our religions and our national identities.

The UN has partnerships and strategic agreements with member nations, as well as other globalist organizations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank, CEPI, GAVI, the World Trade Organization, the European Union, and the World Economic Forum, known as the WEF.

Here’s an example of how the United Nations operates.

The WEF and the UN signed a strategic agreement and partnership in 2019.  Remember that the WEF has a commitment to “stakeholder capitalism,” by which private-partnerships work to control governments.

The WEF developed a plan in 2020 to use the Covid-crisis to reorganize global governance around social issues including climate change – this plan was called the Great Reset.

The WEF is a trade organization representing the world’s largest corporations. It repeatedly exploits disruptive technologies to enhance economic growth opportunities for its corporate members. The WEF is specifically designed to advance the economic power of its global elite members, otherwise known as the “billionaire class.”

As the WEF feeds money into the United Nations through their 2019 strategic agreement, who is managing the conflicts of interests that come with this partnership? Where is the transparency?

The UN has fourteen specialized organizations under its leadership, all involved in global governance, including the World Health Organization or WHO.

None of these organizations have anything to do with the scope of the original UN charter, which was focused on ending wars, promoting world peace, and human rights.

The UN has been quietly building power for years prior to the pandemic through various agreements and treaties. For instance, the “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” is a recent example of such an agreement. Agenda 2030 is a treaty for “transforming our world” and was signed into international law in 2015. This treaty has elevated the United Nations to a position of a self-serving global government bureaucracy.

Agenda 2030 has 17 goals and 169 targets, which vary widely in scope and topic, but almost all of these goals directly affect world governance.

Here are just a few examples from the Agenda 2030 treaty.  Is this what the United Nations should be concerned with, or are these issues more properly addressed by the policies of sovereign nations?

“We are determined to protect the planet from degradation, including through sustainable consumption and production, sustainably managing its natural resources and taking urgent action on climate change.”

“Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men.”

“Eliminate discriminatory laws, policies and practices.“

“Adopt policies, especially fiscal, wage and social protection policies, and progressively achieve greater equality.”

“Facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people.”

“By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.”

“This is an Agenda of unprecedented scope and significance. It is accepted by all countries and is applicable to all…”

Agenda 2030 is essentially a totalitarian socialist manifesto.  These and many more forceful statements regarding the reduction of national rights are found in this United Nations Treaty.

The UN has signed strategic agreements with the largest organizations, corporations, and world powers to fulfill their utopian vision for the world. 

This is a new world order – with unelected officials in control. That means that you and I will be ruled by a non-democratic UN administrative bureaucracy. This is a form of inverse totalitarianism. A world order based on a command economy; one that is at its core both socialist and totalitarian. 

Now, these goals and targets may be fine for any single nation to undertake but this is a restructuring of the United Nations beyond its charter.

Early in the pandemic, the UN – through its surrogate the WHO, declared that a global vaccine passport was needed, and provided extensive guidance to member nations to standardize vaccine passports worldwide.

In response, the leaders of the G-20 issued a declaration in 2022 supporting development of a global standard of vaccination for international travel and the establishment of “global digital health networks” to be built on existing digital Covid-19 vaccine passports.

In June 2023, a new initiative between the EU and the WHO for strategic cooperation on global health issues was announced. This agreement seeks to:

“bolster a robust multilateral system with the World Health Organization at its core, powered by a strong European Union.”

After failing to manage the Covid crisis, the WHO now seeks more money and power to control all aspects of our health and lives.  They intend to amend the International Health Regulations to govern the “pandemic prevention, preparedness and response” of future outbreaks, which includes public health emergencies of any type. This includes a major role for the WHO in direct governance, as opposed to a guidance-based role.

These changes are predicated on G-20 global adoption of “vaccine passports.” These passports will collect and contain private health data, and will enable surveillance, tracking, and control of individuals and populations worldwide. The passports will include not only Covid-19 vaccine data, but the status of all vaccinations. It will become a world digitized passport – including personal health information that the United Nations has no right to access.

The G20 Joint Declaration regarding vaccine passports and future pandemics is a declaration on how future pandemics will be handled.  It states:

“We acknowledge the importance of shared technical standards and verification methods, under the framework of the IHR (2005), to facilitate seamless international travel, interoperability, and recognising digital solutions and non-digital solutions, including proof of vaccinations.

We support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of the efforts to strengthen, prevention and response to future pandemics, that should capitalise and build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID-19 certificates.”

The G-20 is also working with the International Monetary Fund (the financial agency of the UN), the World Bank (which has a founding treaty relationship with the UN) and the Bank for International Settlements to formalize use of central bank digital currencies in banking systems. The Bank for International Settlements specifically refers to “the disruption caused by Covid-19” as a justification to create central bank digital currencies.

The pandemic has allowed world leaders to coalesce global administrative power under the guise of public health through the administrative bureaucracy of the UN. Public health has been weaponized to gain control of passports, travel, banking, the environment, and the international economy. This is a gross violation of the individual’s right to privacy, national sovereignty, and the UN charter.

It is just a matter of time before these vaccine passports will be coupled with central bank digital currencies. Then the passports can be used to deny the unvaccinated or other political dessenters access to travel and use of their own money.

Once international passports, central bank digital currencies, command economy aspects of the UN’s Agenda 2030, and the WHO amendments to the IHRs are put into place, the groundwork for a new world order will be complete. A global administrative state, whose core power resides with the UN, will become a spiderweb of rules, regulations, agreements, and treaties within which individuals and nations will be trapped like flies.

This new global governance will be virtually unbreakable.  From there, it is only a matter of time before national sovereignty becomes obsolete. This is a reality, unless we fight to stop this madness.

For this reason, the power of the United Nations must be exposed and curtailed.

Globalists seeking to advance their agendas are using the model of the European Union, whereby rules and regulations stymie national sovereignty, to build a worldwide system of control. 

All must fight this takeover at the local, national and international level. We must use the courts, our legislatures, media, public protests and the power vested in our national and state sovereignty to fight this. If all else fails, individual nations may need to withdraw from the UN’s New World Order in order to remain free.

Let’s work together to keep our personal and national sovereignty safe for future generations. A New World Order is not needed, is not acceptable, and we the people and our sovereign governments should unequivocally reject this globalized takeover.

This speech was written and then delivered at the International Crisis Summit held in The Palace of the Parliament in Romania by Jill Glasspool Malone on Nov 18, 2023.

-------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Malone is a physician and biochemist. His work focuses on mRNA technology, pharmaceuticals, and drug repurposing research. You can find him at Substack and Gettr

------------------------------------------------

Source

https://brownstone.org/articles/pandemics-as-a-catalyst-for-a-new-world-order/