The Allison Inquiry - Additional Testimonials on Day 4

The Allison Inquiry - Additional Testimonials on Day 4

----------------------------------

What did Dr. Peter McCullough (Cardiologist) have to say on day 4 of the Allison Inquiry?

 During his testimony on Day 4 (September 11, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough presented evidence regarding post-vaccination health complications and criticized the institutional response of the medical establishment.

Key highlights from his testimony include:

• Pathological and Case Findings: Dr. McCullough presented case evidence outlining severe post-vaccination adverse outcomes. He referenced a specific published case where a patient received three vaccine doses, developed a cardiac tumor that metastasized to the brain, and tissue analysis revealed evidence of genetic material coding for fragments of the spike protein.

• Protocols for Treatment: He discussed therapeutic approaches and Spike Protein Detoxification protocols aimed at treating individuals experiencing long-term post-vaccination injuries or syndromes.

• Call for Recognition and Research: McCullough emphasized that regulatory agencies and the broader medical community need to officially acknowledge vaccine-induced injuries. He stressed the necessity of dedicated research, treatment pathways, and institutional accountability for impacted patients.

For direct coverage of his full testimony, you can watch Peter A McCullough Testifies at the Allison Inquiry.

This video contains Dr. McCullough's sworn testimony delivered on the final day of the inquiry, detailing his clinical observations, published research findings, and recommended care approaches for vaccine-injured individuals.

----------------------------------------

What did Rodney Palmer (Former CBC investigative journalist) have to say on day 4 of the Allison Inquiry?

 During his testimony on Day 4 (September 11, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, veteran investigative journalist and former CBC bureau chief Rodney Palmer delivered a critique of the Canadian news media's pandemic coverage, specifically focusing on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC).

Key highlights from his testimony include:

• Shift from Independent Reporting to State Alignment: Drawing on his 20+ years of newsroom experience and past work covering state-controlled media environments in foreign bureaus, Palmer argued that public broadcasting shifted away from objective journalism and independent inquiry during the pandemic, operating instead to promote government-aligned messaging.

• Selective Reporting and Omission: He defined the media response during the pandemic as a form of news manipulation and propaganda—arguing that by heavily repeating official messaging while ignoring or minimizing reports of vaccine injuries, public debate and informed consent were suppressed.

• Use of Experts and Editorial Framing: Palmer cited specific broadcast examples to illustrate his point, including televised segments directing viewers on how to address relatives who questioned government measures, as well as the routine reliance on government-funded academics presented as neutral experts.

• Participation in Global Initiatives: He highlighted mainstream media participation in international efforts such as the Trusted News Initiative, arguing that such frameworks contributed to coordinated editorial stances that censored alternative perspectives and critical scientific debate.

For direct coverage of his testimony, you can watch Rodney Palmer Details News Manipulation at the Allison Inquiry.

--------------------------------------

What did Dianne Spaulding (Laboratory technician and founder of the Silent Survivors support group) say on day 4 of the Allison Inquiry?

 During her testimony on Day 4 (September 11, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Dianne Spaulding—a medical laboratory technologist and founder of the Silent Survivors support group—shared her personal experience with post-vaccination health complications and the challenges she faced within the healthcare system.

Key highlights from her testimony include:

• Onset of Acute Symptoms: Spaulding testified that following an AstraZeneca injection in the spring of 2021, she suffered severe, multi-system physical symptoms. These included extensive internal vibrations, muscle tremors, severe exhaustion, cognitive brain fog, and sensitivity to light and noise that left her bedridden for months.

• Medical Gaslighting and Institutional Pushback: She recounted her experiences navigating emergency rooms and specialist consultations, noting that despite visible physical symptoms (including unexplained bruising and bleeding), multiple practitioners attributed her condition to anxiety or prescribed anti-depressants rather than conducting an investigation into a vaccine reaction.

• Public Health Directives: Spaulding detailed the frustration of being advised by local public health officials to receive a second dose despite her ongoing physical complications, before eventually obtaining a medical exemption.

• Founding Silent Survivors: In response to feeling dismissed by the medical establishment and recognizing that others were experiencing similar outcomes, she founded the Silent Survivors support group to connect, advocate for, and provide a community for vaccine-injured Canadians.

• Call for Compassion: She urged lawmakers and medical institutions to acknowledge post-vaccination injuries, advocate for dedicated care pathways, and treat affected individuals with basic empathy and compassion.

Testimony of Dianne Spaulding | The Allison Inquiry

----------------------------------------

What did Toni Lannigan (former frontline nurse assistant in acute/palliative care) say on day 4 of the Allison inquiry?

On Day 4 (September 11, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, former acute and palliative care nurse Toni Lannigan shared her personal experience regarding severe, immediate post-vaccination complications and her subsequent navigation of the healthcare system.

Key points from her testimony include:

• Acute Reaction Following Injection: Lannigan testified that as a frontline healthcare worker priority recipient, she received her first Pfizer dose on March 26, 2021. She described suffering a severe anaphylactic shock within five minutes of the shot, requiring emergency treatment with three doses of epinephrine and intensive care.

• Long-Term Neurological and Physical Symptoms: She detailed a range of persistent physical issues following the incident, including vision loss affecting her right eye, severe cognitive impairment ("brain fog"), debilitating fatigue, physical disturbances, and panic attacks.

• Dismissal and Public Statements: Lannigan reported experiencing medical dismissal, stating a physician told her the symptoms were "all in her head". She also expressed frustration over public health officials issuing statements indicating she had fully recovered, which she formally denied.

• Career and Financial Fallout: She testified that her ongoing physical impairments made it impossible to continue practicing as a nurse, forcing her to transition to working part-time as a teaching assistant for students with learning disabilities. She also cited significant financial strain resulting from legal and compensation disputes.

• Appeal to Lawmakers: Emphasizing her feeling of social isolation and being ignored by authorities, she called on Parliament to recognize vaccine-injured Canadians and ensure they receive proper medical care and institutional support.

For direct coverage of her presentation, you can watch Testimony of Toni Lannigan — Allison Inquiry.

----------------------------------------

What did Lisa Watson (former Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) employee) have to say on day 4 of the Allison Inquiry?

 During her testimony on Day 4 (September 11, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, former Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) employee Lisa Watson shared details regarding her severe neurological diagnosis following a COVID-19 vaccination.

Key highlights from her testimony include:

• Onset of Acute Symptoms: Watson described being an active worker planning to set up a hobby farm with her family prior to receiving her first Pfizer dose. Twelve days after her injection, she experienced sudden weakness, severe midsection tightness, and violent muscle spasms.

• Diagnosis of Transverse Myelitis: Following an emergency MRI and a 10-week hospital stay, she was diagnosed with transverse myelitis, a rare neurological condition that left her experiencing a severe physical paradox—paralyzed on one side of her body while numb on the other.

• Battle Over Medical Exemptions: She detailed her post-diagnosis efforts to navigate the administrative and medical systems, including the obstacles she encountered while trying to apply for a medical exemption.

• Family Support and Resilience: Watson emphasized the physical, emotional, and practical impact of having her life altered overnight, speaking on the vital role family support played in her ongoing recovery and adjustment.

For direct coverage of her presentation to the panel, you can watch Lisa Watson's Testimony at the Allison Inquiry.

-----------------------------------

What did Joseph Pritchard say on day 4 of the Allison Inquiry?

 During his testimony on Day 4 (September 11, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Joseph Pritchard shared his personal perspective on post-vaccination health complications, focusing on the loss of his brother six days after a COVID-19 injection.

Key points from his testimony include:

• Account of His Brother's Death: Pritchard testified as a grieving sibling seeking answers regarding the sudden death of his brother, which occurred six days after receiving a vaccine dose.

• Call for Institutional Help and Support: He expressed frustration with the lack of institutional assistance and recognition for families impacted by adverse events, stating, "I know Canada takes care of everybody else but me and everybody else who's come... We do need help."

• Demand for Answers and Accountability: He called on public health authorities and lawmakers to thoroughly investigate post-vaccination deaths and severe reactions, emphasizing the need for transparency, accountability, and support for grieving families seeking medical truth.

For direct coverage of his testimony, you can watch Joseph Pritchard's Testimony at the Allison Inquiry.

-------------------------------------------

What did Carol Messenger say on day 4 of the Allison inquiry?

 Carol Messenger did not speak on Day 4 (September 11, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry. Her complete testimony was delivered on Day 3 (September 10, 2026).

During her testimony on Day 3, she detailed:

• Onset of Paralysis: Losing lower-body mobility 24 days after her second COVID-19 dose and receiving a diagnosis of transverse myelitis caused by a spinal cord lesion.

• Impact & Recovery: The physical challenges of nerve spasms, losing her 22-year career as a Vancouver Fire Captain, and working through ongoing physical rehabilitation to regain mobility.

• Errors by the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP): The administrative error where the federal program mistakenly listed her as "deceased" in official medical documentation sent to her doctor while her compensation claim was pending.

For direct access to her presentation from Day 3, you can view Carol Messenger's Testimony at the Allison Inquiry.

-----------------------------------------

What did Robert Denesiuk say on day 4 of the Allison Inquiry?

 During his testimony on Day 4 (September 11, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Robert Denesiuk, a 56-year-old former janitor from Comox, British Columbia, shared his account of experiencing a sudden medical crisis following a COVID-19 vaccination.

Key points from his testimony include:

• Onset of Sudden Collapse: Denesiuk recounted working as a janitor prior to receiving the vaccine. He described an event where he was walking and suddenly collapsed, which led to an emergency hospitalization.

• Severe Physical Deterioration: He detailed how his health condition severely deteriorated following his hospital admission, reaching a point where he feared for his life due to the severity of his symptoms.

• Motivations for Testifying: Denesiuk explained that he traveled to Ottawa to share his experience before lawmakers to bring awareness to post-vaccination health outcomes and to advocate for greater transparency and safety evaluations regarding COVID-19 vaccines.

For direct coverage of his testimony, you can watch Robert Denesiuk's Testimony at the Allison Inquiry.

-------------------------------------------

What did MP Dean Allison (Chair): Conservative Member of Parliament, say on day 4 of the Allison Inquiry?

As the Chair of the independent hearings held on Parliament Hill, Conservative Member of Parliament Dean Allison (Niagara West) presided over the proceedings and delivered the closing statements at the conclusion of Day 4 (September 11, 2026).

Key elements of MP Dean Allison's remarks and framing on Day 4 include:

• Shattering the Ceiling on Silence: In his official closing address, Allison declared that the four-day inquiry had successfully "shattered the ceiling on silence" surrounding COVID-19 vaccine injuries and post-vaccination complications in Canada.

• Providing a Neutral Parliamentary Forum: He emphasized the purpose of creating the independent, non-partisan panel—held inside Parliament Hill—to allow affected Canadians, physicians, and researchers a formal platform to present sworn testimony and medical documentation without fear of dismissal or censorship.

• An Opening Salvo for Accountability: Framing the conclusion of the proceedings, Allison stated that the end of the four-day inquiry was not a final destination, but rather an opening salvo in an ongoing effort to push public health authorities, lawmakers, and institutions toward transparent evaluation, recognition, and accountability.

• Acknowledgment of Witnesses and Organizers: He expressed gratitude to the over 1,400 Canadians who submitted applications, the selected witnesses who shared their personal and professional accounts, legal counsel Shawn Buckley, and the volunteer teams who facilitated the hearings.

For direct coverage of the final day's proceedings, you can watch Final Day — Allison Inquiry Live from Parliament Hill.

--------------------------------------

What did Legal counsel Shawn Buckley say on day 4 of the Allison Inquiry?

As legal counsel for the independent hearings, Shawn Buckley played a central role throughout the four-day event, conducting the primary questioning of witnesses and guiding the inquiry's legal framework.

During Day 4 (September 11, 2026), Buckley delivered key remarks during witness examinations and closing statements:

• Scope and Purpose of the Inquiry: Buckley reiterated the strict foundational mandate of the Allison Inquiry—emphasizing that because it was a preliminary, independent forum with a tight four-day schedule, its primary objective was simply to provide an official, neutral platform on Parliament Hill for vaccine-injured Canadians and experts to give sworn testimony, rather than to make formal legal findings of fact or draw final conclusions.

• Witness Vetting and Selection: He outlined the vetting process behind the testimony, explaining that out of more than 1,400 applicant submissions, a team of medical professionals reviewed medical documentation to select approximately 50 representative cases to present before panel members.

• Institutional Silence and Accountability: Buckley highlighted the systematic refusal of health authorities and government agencies—such as Health Canada—to engage with or acknowledge vaccine-injured citizens. He noted that running the proceedings inside Parliament was a vital first step in breaking the institutional silence surrounding these adverse outcomes and creating a permanent public record.

• Call for Parliamentary Action: In his concluding remarks, Buckley urged sitting Members of Parliament and Senators to review the sworn evidence, listen to the testimonies gathered across the four days, and advocate for formal parliamentary reviews, regulatory reforms, and proper support structures for impacted Canadians.

For direct coverage of the proceedings and legal statements, you can watch Shawn Buckley Opening Remarks at the Allison Inquiry.

--------------------------------------------

Source

Google Gemini

The Allison Inquiry - Additional Testimonials on Day 3

The Allison Inquiry - Additional Testimonials on Day 3

-------------------------------

What did Ken Drysdale (an engineer and lead author of the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) report.) say on day 3 of the inquiry?

 During his testimony on Day 3 (September 10, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Ken Drysdale focused primarily on synthesizing the findings and methodology of the citizen-led National Citizens Inquiry (NCI).

Key points covered in his testimony include:

• Scope and Structure of the NCI: He outlined how the citizen-funded NCI held hearings across eight Canadian cities, collecting sworn testimonies from 333 witnesses—including citizens, medical professionals, and expert researchers—which yielded over 5,000 pages of evidence and 300 policy recommendations.

• Witness Intimidation and Atmosphere of Fear: Drysdale detailed the climate of fear surrounding the hearings. He noted that numerous witnesses faced significant pressure, intimidation, venue cancellations, or social and professional fallout, leading some to withdraw out of fear of family exclusion or financial retaliation.

• Regulatory Oversight Concerns: He highlighted concerns regarding regulatory modifications made to Canada's Food and Drug Regulations. He argued that changes made to the drug approval process rendered safety and efficacy evaluations overly subjective, creating potential conflicts of interest.

• Impact of Lockdowns and Mandates: He discussed witness accounts detailing the broader societal harms of pandemic policies, such as the isolation and health deterioration of seniors during lockdowns, as well as the impact of vaccine mandates and injuries.

• The National Citizens Archive & Recommendations: He introduced the National Citizens Archive—a searchable repository containing video testimonies and transcriptions meant to serve as a resource for researchers and lawmakers. He advocated for restoring strict, objective evidence standards for future drug approvals and reinstating protections for informed consent.

For full context on these proceedings, you can view the video covering Ken Drysdale's Testimony at the Allison Inquiry.

This video provides a direct overview of Drysdale's presentation, outlining the NCI's findings, witness accounts, and proposed regulatory reforms presented during Day 3 of the inquiry.

--------------------------------------------

What did Deanna McLeod (a medical researcher and founder of Toronto-based Kaleidoscope Strategies Inc.) say on day 3 of the Allison inquiry?

 During her testimony on Day 3 (September 10, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, medical researcher Deanna McLeod focused her presentation on analyzing how standard medical protocols, safety oversight, and informed consent shifted under pandemic-era emergency management.

Key points from her testimony include:

• Shift in Medical Ethics and Patient Care: McLeod presented evidence arguing that standard clinical protocols were fundamentally altered during the COVID-19 response. She highlighted how medical decision-making shifted from prioritizing individual patient care and customized medical needs toward collective public health directives.

• Public Health and Commercial Alignment: She asserted that the urgency surrounding the mass vaccination campaign compromised normal independent safety evaluation pathways and standard informed consent procedures. In her analysis, she stated that "public health became the [pharmaceutical companies'] marketing arm," arguing that regulatory agencies effectively promoted products rather than maintaining strict, neutral oversight.

• Evaluation of Clinical Trials and Regulatory Review: Drawing on her experience in medical research and regulatory strategy, McLeod examined the differences between traditional long-term clinical trials and the expedited, rolling reviews used to authorize emergency vaccines. She raised concerns over how trial data was gathered, reviewed, and communicated to both healthcare professionals and the public.

For further details on her testimony and related inquiry presentations, you can watch Deanna McLeod's Presentation at the Allison Inquiry.

This video contains her expert presentation to the inquiry panel, detailing her analysis of trial data, regulatory pathways, and population-level health trends.

-----------------------------------------

What did Helen Grus (a detective with the Ottawa Police Service) have to say on day 3 of the Allison Inquiry?

During her testimony on Day 3 (September 10, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus testified about her investigation into a sudden spike in unexplained infant deaths in Ottawa and the professional fallout she subsequently faced.

Key highlights from her testimony include:

• Observation of an Infant Death Spike: Grus testified that in January 2022, she was alerted by a colleague in the Sexual Assault and Child Abuse (SACA) unit to an unusual increase in unexplained infant deaths. Upon querying Ottawa Police Service records, she identified six unexplained infant deaths, compared to a typical baseline of two or three per year.

• Concerns Over Investigative Procedures: She testified that her review of the cases raised concerns that standard investigative procedures—such as questionnaires used in sudden unexpected infant death investigations—had not been fully completed, with at least one case being concluded prior to the arrival of autopsy results.

• Inquiry into Vaccine Status: Grus noted that while she was trying to gather data on the COVID-19 vaccination status of the mothers, she was not drawing definitive conclusions about the cause of death. She recalled explaining to senior officials that she was simply noting an increase that warranted a complete investigation.

• Suspension and Disciplinary Proceedings: She detailed the professional ramifications of her inquiries, including her suspension in February 2022, followed by a long police disciplinary tribunal process where she was found guilty of discreditable conduct for conducting an unauthorized investigation, leading to a temporary demotion.

• Call for Dialogue: Grus expressed that she holds no anger toward colleagues involved in the process. She shared that upon returning from suspension in October 2022, she asked police executives if they could sit down to discuss the matter, a request that was declined, though she maintains that open communication remains her goal.

For further details on her testimony and related inquiry presentations, you can watch Helen Grus Testimony at the Allison Inquiry.

----------------------------------------

What did Dr. Crystal Luchkiw say on day 3 of the Allison Inquiry?

On Day 3 (September 10, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Ontario physician Dr. Crystal Luchkiw provided emotional testimony on behalf of her late brother, Scott Luchkiw.

Key elements of her testimony include:

• Testifying on Behalf of Her Late Brother: Dr. Luchkiw explained that her brother Scott, a former parliamentary aide, had originally applied and intended to testify at the inquiry himself to speak about the severe health complications—including myocarditis—he developed after receiving a COVID-19 injection. Because he passed away on July 4, 2026, prior to the hearings, she appeared on his behalf.

• Employment Mandates and Health Deterioration: She detailed how her brother had felt compelled to get vaccinated in order to maintain his employment. She recounted the trajectory of his health issues following the injections, which led to multiple hospitalizations and severe cardiovascular strain before his death.

• Concerns Over Medical Ethics and Oversight: Drawing on her background as a practicing physician, Dr. Luchkiw addressed broader issues surrounding medical informed consent, regulatory oversight, and the professional pressure faced by healthcare workers who voiced concerns about post-vaccination adverse events during the pandemic response.

For additional context on her presentation to the panel, you can view Dr. Crystal Luchkiw's Testimony at the Allison Inquiry.

----------------------------------------

What did Patricia Leidl (a former World Health Organization (WHO)), say on day 3 of the Allison Inquiry?

 During her testimony on Day 3 (September 10, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Patricia Leidl—a writer, international development professional, and former World Health Organization (WHO) communications employee—provided personal testimony detailing severe, long-term health complications following her second COVID-19 vaccine dose.

Key points from her testimony include:

• Onset of Symptoms: Leidl testified that seven days after receiving her second COVID-19 shot on June 10, 2021, she experienced severe sudden pain and collapsed. Prior to this, she was in excellent physical health, physically fit, and a non-smoker.

• Long-Term Health Impacts: She detailed a cascade of chronic neurological and inflammatory conditions that persisted over the following five years. Her diagnosed conditions include central nervous system pain, chronic migraines, bilateral tendinopathy, arteriosclerosis, severe light sensitivity, tinnitus, chronic gastritis, tachycardia, hearing loss in one ear, and cognitive difficulties.

• Personal, Financial, and Professional Fallout: Leidl stated that her injuries forced her to forfeit a new job in Vienna, Austria, that she had been scheduled to start shortly after receiving the shot. She estimated spending approximately $250,000 trying to regain her health and described how the condition effectively halted her career and led to social isolation, remarking: "My life is effectively destroyed."

• Perspective on Vaccination and Stigma: Leidl emphasized that despite her injury, she does not consider herself "anti-vax" nor is her fight political. She expressed frustration over being labeled or dismissed socially and politically simply for sharing her documented medical outcome, calling on governments to take responsibility and properly support individuals who suffered severe adverse reactions.

For direct coverage and further context on her testimony, you can watch Patricia Leidl Testifies at the Allison Inquiry.

---------------------------------------

What did Carol Messenger (a former Vancouver fire captain) have to say on day3 of the Allison Inquiry?

 During her testimony on Day 3 (September 10, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, retired Vancouver Fire Captain Carol Messenger shared her experience suffering a severe neurological injury following a mandated COVID-19 injection.

Key highlights from her testimony include:

• Onset of Lower-Body Paralysis: Messenger, who served 22 years with Vancouver Fire Rescue Services and was the first female promoted to officer rank in VFRS history, detailed how 24 days after receiving her second dose, she lost lower-body function overnight. She was subsequently diagnosed with transverse myelitis caused by a spinal cord lesion.

• Impact and Rehabilitation: She described the physical reality of losing her mobility, experiencing severe nerve spasms, and having to undergo extensive ongoing rehabilitation to regain lower-body function.

• Errors in the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP): Messenger recounted the bureaucratic ordeal she faced while navigating the federal Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP). She highlighted how VISP mistakenly designated her as a "deceased claimant" in official correspondence sent to her doctor.

• Systemic Delays: She testified about the ongoing delays in receiving financial or medical assistance, noting that the error and administrative backlogs significantly prolonged the review of her compensation claim.

For full coverage of her testimony, you can watch Carol Messenger's Testimony at the Allison Inquiry.

----------------------------------------------

And what did Stéphanie Giguère have to say on day 3 of the Allison Inquiry?

 During her testimony on Day 3 (September 10, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Stéphanie Giguère shared personal testimony detailing severe post-vaccination health complications and the social and systemic challenges she faced as a result.

Key highlights from her testimony include:

• Onset of Health Complications: Giguère recounted receiving a dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine and subsequently experiencing severe, persistent physical symptoms. She described suffering from nighttime sensation issues resembling electric shocks, severe ongoing back pain, and a complete inability to eat normally.

• Inadequate Pain Relief & Specialist Access: She testified that standard prescription pain management—including morphine—had no effect on relieving her severe symptoms. Furthermore, she detailed the extreme difficulty she faced in securing medical follow-up, stating that up to 15 specialist referrals were refused.

• Impact on Daily Living & Family Life: Because of her functional decline, Giguère testified that her daughters had to step in to manage her daily tasks and household responsibilities.

• Social Isolation & Ostracization: She shared how the onset of her condition led to complete isolation and feeling ostracized by her social circle and community when trying to communicate the cause and severity of her injuries.

-------------------------------------

Source

Google Gemini