The Allison Inquiry - Additional Testimonials on Day 2
-------------------------------
What did Legal Analyst, Daniel Freiheit have to say in Day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 of the Allison Inquiry, corporate and regulatory lawyer Daniel Freiheit delivered expert testimony analyzing the mechanics, contract structures, and administration of Canada’s Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) based on Access to Information (ATIP) disclosures.
The key points of his testimony included:
Disproportionate Administrative Costs: Freiheit testified that ATIP disclosures revealed roughly 60% to 63% of the program's overall budget was allocated to administrative expenses rather than directly compensating injured claimants.
Contractual Redactions and Appeal Clauses: He highlighted heavily redacted terms within government agreements—specifically clauses like Section 3.1.3—and argued that details regarding how rejected claimants can re-submit claims with new medical evidence were kept opaque.
Systemic and Logistical Hurdles: Freiheit pointed to high administrative staff turnover and heavy burdens placed on physicians regarding chain-of-custody documentation for medical records, which caused massive processing delays for applicants.
Policy Recommendations: He outlined recommendations for reform, calling for greater transparency, streamlined acquisition of medical records, and the establishment of formal, qualified, and independent medical review boards.
For a direct look at his full statement during the proceedings, you can view his testimony in the
-----------------------------------------
What did Dr. Jessica Rose (Computational biologist and data analyst) have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, computational biologist and data analyst Dr. Jessica Rose delivered data-driven testimony focusing on statistical patterns within public health safety tracking systems.
Key aspects of her testimony included:
Discrepancies in Reporting Rates: Dr. Rose presented statistical comparative analyses showing that Canada’s recorded adverse event reporting rate was significantly lower than rates recorded in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
She argued this gap was not due to lower rates of injury among Canadians, but rather because Canada’s reporting system operates under tighter gatekeeping and controls at both input and processing stages. Analysis of Public Safety Tracking Systems: She reviewed data across multiple platforms, including VAERS, CDC V-safe data obtained via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, and Canada's Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP).
Systemic Barrier Critiques: Her slides highlighted structural obstacles within Canada's tracking infrastructure, pointing to multi-layered reporting procedures for physicians that lead to underreporting and data suppression.
Transparency and Accountability: Dr. Rose emphasized her goal of using statistical modeling and public safety data to bring transparency to health metrics and advocate for clearer recognition of vaccine-injured individuals.
You can view her full presentation and technical slides in
This video provides the direct recording of Dr. Jessica Rose's presentation during Day 2 of the inquiry, capturing her complete statistical analysis and data slides.
-----------------------------------
What did Dr. Charles Hoffe have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Dr. Charles Hoffe, a family practitioner from Lytton, British Columbia with over 30 years of medical experience, delivered testimony detailing his clinical observations and subsequent professional experiences during the pandemic.
Key points from Dr. Hoffe's testimony included:
Clinical Observations: He described observing a wave of sudden, severe neurological injuries and physical debilitation among his rural B.C. patients following COVID-19 vaccination.
Institutional Responses & Reporting: Dr. Hoffe testified that when he attempted to report these adverse events through official channels to senior public health officials—including writing an open letter to B.C. Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry—his concerns were largely dismissed without investigation, and he was told not to attribute the health conditions to vaccine injuries.
Professional Retaliation: He detailed facing significant professional consequences for speaking out publicly, including losing his emergency room privileges after 30 years and undergoing disciplinary proceedings by the B.C. College of Physicians and Surgeons.
He noted that charges were ultimately withdrawn, which he claimed was stated in documentation as having achieved a "deterrent objective". Policy & System Reform Demands: Dr. Hoffe called for legislative protections for medical freedom of expression so that physicians can report adverse events without fear of losing their licenses.
He also advocated for removing pharmaceutical industry funding from regulatory bodies like Health Canada to eliminate perceived conflicts of interest.
For his direct testimony, you can watch
This video features Dr. Charles Hoffe's full testimony and cross-examination during the Day 2 proceedings in Ottawa, capturing his account as a frontline physician.
--------------------------------------
What did Michelle Worton (A dental hygienist) have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Michelle Worton provided emotional testimony outlining severe health complications following her COVID-19 vaccination.
Key elements of her testimony included:
Physical Transformation and Impairment: Worton explained that prior to receiving the injection, she was extremely active—running 20 kilometers every other day.
Following vaccination, she suffered multiple strokes and a brain hemorrhage, which left her with severe neurological damage requiring her to walk with a cane. Medical System Experience: She detailed facing extensive medical dismissals and clinical "gaslighting" from healthcare providers when attempting to get an official diagnosis or connect her symptoms to the vaccine.
Support System Gaps: She testified about feeling abandoned by the official healthcare system and government support structures, stating through tears that her life had been severely disrupted by a Health Canada-approved product without adequate help provided.
Advocacy Data (CANrise19): Worton shared statistical context gathered through CANrise19, highlighting the large number of vaccine-injured Canadians who remain uncompensated or have not applied to the federal Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP).
Her full testimony can be viewed in
This video features Michelle Worton's individual testimony delivered during Day 2 of the Allison Inquiry, providing her direct account of her health struggles and advocacy efforts.
--------------------------------------
What did Vienna Demeduk have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Vienna Demeduk, a 63-year-old massage therapist and long-distance runner from Vancouver, British Columbia, delivered sworn testimony detailing severe health complications and systemic issues she encountered following her COVID-19 vaccination.
Key points from her testimony included:
Onset of Medical Crisis: Demeduk testified that prior to her vaccination, she maintained an active lifestyle as a long-distance runner.
She stated that within 48 hours of receiving a Moderna dose in July 2021, she felt a sudden "pop" in her head, lost her vision, and suffered a severe cerebellar stroke, followed shortly by a brain hemorrhage and multiple subsequent strokes. Concerns Over Medical Records and Transparency: She described encountering significant resistance within the healthcare system when seeking explanations.
Demeduk testified about experiencing what she termed medical corruption, alleging that doctors would only speak to her candidly off the record when alone, while official medical files were heavily redacted or inaccurate. Systemic and Institutional Roadblocks: Her statement highlighted the severe difficulty injured individuals face when trying to obtain clear medical diagnoses, access appropriate patient care, or navigate support pathways like the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP).
What did Cameron Hitchcock have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Cameron Hitchcock delivered sworn testimony detailing severe, complex physical health complications that developed following his COVID-19 vaccination.
Key details from his testimony included:
Onset of Severe Organ Damage: Hitchcock described suffering from extensive internal organ necrosis post-vaccination, leading to severe physiological dysfunction and extreme physical distress.
Physical Manifestations and Symptoms: He presented visual and medical evidence documenting his condition, including severe swelling (edema) in his extremities and feet alongside other systemic complications.
Medical Evaluations & Navigation: He detailed the extensive, multi-specialist medical evaluations he underwent while seeking diagnostic clarity and relief, highlighting the challenges of managing multi-system organ impairment and navigating clinical care pathways.
For a direct look at his sworn statement and presentation during the hearings, you can view
-------------------------------------
What did Nathalie Barbe have to say on day 2 of the Inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Nathalie Barbe, a former clinic and healthcare security worker from the Upper Gatineau region of Quebec, delivered sworn testimony describing severe, multi-systemic health complications and career disruption following her COVID-19 vaccinations.
Key points from her testimony included:
Mandatory Vaccination & Employment: Barbe testified that she received three doses of the Moderna vaccine between October and December 2021 as a mandatory requirement to maintain her job as a security guard in healthcare settings.
Onset of Severe Symptoms: She described going from an active, independent individual to experiencing constant physical distress shortly after vaccination. Her reported symptoms included daily vomiting, facial paralysis, chronic severe pain, loss of menstruation, and neurological dysfunction.
Healthcare Barriers in Rural Quebec: Barbe detailed significant obstacles accessing specialized medical care in her region.
She testified that several treating physicians dismissed potential connections between her symptoms and the vaccine, describing her situation as complex while offering little actionable treatment. She noted having to organize her own medical appointments, tests, and referrals. Disability & Loss of Independence: She testified that her conditions forced her out of the workforce entirely, leaving her unable to function independently.
She shared that she has since been formally recognized as disabled by Retraite Québec.
Her individual testimony can be viewed directly in
This video features Nathalie Barbe's full statement and account delivered during the Day 2 proceedings on Parliament Hill.
--------------------------------------------
What did Michael Oesch have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Michael Oesch delivered sworn testimony regarding severe, progressive physical impairment following his COVID-19 vaccination.
Key details and accounts from his testimony included:
Onset of Health Complications: Oesch described experiencing progressive neurological deterioration starting after his fourth COVID-19 vaccine dose in October 2022. His reported symptoms included limb numbness, severe muscle spasms lasting up to seven hours a night, loss of overall mobility, and a diagnosed 2.8 cm spinal lesion.
Loss of Mobility and Care Admission: He explained that his condition deteriorated to the point where he lost the ability to walk, required a wheelchair for mobility, and was admitted to a long-term care facility.
Crowdfunding and Community Advocacy: Oesch shared that he crowdfunded to cover his travel expenses to Parliament Hill for the hearings and rented an accessible, adapted bus so other individuals with disabilities could also attend the inquiry.
Systemic Critiques and Recommendations: He criticized the federal government's Vaccine Impact Assistance Program (VIAP, formerly VISP) as poorly designed and difficult for injured claimants to navigate. He urged the Public Health Agency of Canada to take direct oversight of claims and evaluate cases using World Health Organization (WHO) causality standards.
Documentary Project: He noted his involvement with a documentary project titled "Why Can't We Talk About This?", created to raise awareness around vaccine injury experiences and reduce public stigma.
His complete individual statement and presentation during the hearings can be viewed in
------------------------------------------
What did Jasmeet Grewal have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, 35-year-old Jasmeet Grewal delivered sworn testimony detailing his severe health decline and medical complications following his second Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine dose in June 2021.
Key points from his testimony included:
Life Prior to Injury: Grewal described how active, healthy, and athletic he was prior to vaccination at age 31. He worked as a business development manager for an AI firm, played on multiple softball and basketball leagues, golfed, played soccer, and participated in high-energy traditional South Asian dance performances (including performing at a Toronto Raptors halftime show).
Initial Onset and Medical Skepticism: Within two months of receiving his second dose, he developed severe cramping, stiffness, and tingling in his legs. When he sought medical care as his balance and gait deteriorated, physicians initially dismissed his physical symptoms as psychological or anxiety-related, diagnosing him with Functional Neurological Disorder (FND).
Hospitalization and Severe Neurological Diagnosis: In April 2022, an nerve conduction velocity test revealed severe demyelination throughout his body. He was immediately hospitalized for six months, lost all lower-limb mobility, and developed constant, burning nerve pain and hand tremors.
Severe Gastrointestinal Dysfunction: His condition subsequently progressed to severe gastrointestinal failure. He explained that he cannot consume food or water orally without immediately vomiting. To survive, he relies on continuous 12-hour-a-day feeding pumps:
A Gastrojejunal (GJ) tube feeding directly into his intestine.
A Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) line routed into a major vein in his chest to deliver calories, fluids, and essential vitamins directly into his bloodstream.
Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP / VIAP) Experience: Grewal detailed submitting 800 to 1,000 pages of comprehensive medical records to apply for the federal support program. He testified that his application was initially denied because the board claimed there was an uncertain gap between the vaccination date and symptom onset. He noted that he is currently appealing the decision amidst administrative delays during the program's transition to the Vaccine Impact Assistance Program (VIAP).
His full testimony can be viewed in
---------------------------------------
What did Kelly Shorkey have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Kelly Shorkey, a community health worker, delivered sworn testimony regarding severe multi-system health complications following her Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination.
Key details and accounts from her testimony included:
Onset of Health Complications: Shorkey testified that after receiving the vaccine, she developed facial paralysis (Bell's palsy), damage to multiple cranial nerves (nerves 5, 7, 9, and 10), vision problems, weakness on the right side of her body, and severe chronic fatigue.
Recognition by Multiple Insurance & Benefit Programs: She highlighted that four major organizations—including WorkSafeBC, Canada Life, Sun Life, and the Canada Pension Plan (CPP)—officially recognized her vaccine injury and provided coverage or disability benefits.
Denial by Federal Support System: In contrast to the other institutional bodies, she testified that the federal Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP / VIAP) did not follow those diagnoses and refused to recognize her injury for federal compensation.
Medical Obstacles and Systemic Dismissal: Shorkey shared that she consulted 55 different specialists while struggling to secure a family doctor due to primary care shortages. She described encountering reluctance from specialists to officially document a connection to the vaccine, recalling one neurologist explicitly telling her, "No, no, no, I will not get into the politics of this."
Impact on Daily Functioning: She explained that her chronic conditions and fatigue have severely restricted her life, leaving her with enough energy to manage only one activity per day.
Her complete testimony can be viewed directly in
-----------------------------------
What did Thor Hart have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Thor Hart, a 55-year-old father of four and former General Motors group leader, delivered sworn testimony detailing severe physical decline and disability following his required COVID-19 vaccination.
Key points from his testimony included:
Life Prior to Vaccination: Hart testified that prior to his injury, he was highly active and physically fit, training five days a week as a bodybuilder, preparing for strongman competitions, and practicing kung fu.
Workplace Mandate Pressure: He explained that as a group leader at General Motors, he faced workplace vaccination requirements (to be vaccinated by December 12, 2021, or face termination) in order to retain his job and provide for his family of four.
Onset of Medical Crisis & Physical Disability: Following vaccination, he suffered severe health complications that stripped away his physical strength, rendering him disabled and forcing him out of the workforce.
Family & Financial Impact: He detailed the severe emotional and financial toll the illness and job loss took on his household, shifting his role from a family provider to a disabled worker reliant on caregiving.
What did James Freeland have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, James Freeland provided sworn testimony regarding the sudden death of his 60-year-old mother following her COVID-19 vaccination.
Key points from his testimony included:
Sudden Passing: Freeland testified that his 60-year-old mother—who had no prior medical history beyond manageable Type 2 diabetes—died suddenly just two days after receiving her vaccine shot.
Explanation by Medical Staff: He described standing in a hospital hallway where medical staff informed him that his mother had died from what was described as a "hard hit to the heart," without providing further diagnostic explanations.
Obstacles to Investigation: He detailed encountering a lack of thorough investigation or follow-up regarding her cause of death, noting that no autopsy was conducted and the body was rapidly scheduled for cremation, which prevented further independent examination or scrutiny into potential vaccine causality.
What did Marylou Lavalle have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Marylou Lavalle delivered sworn, emotional testimony regarding the death of her husband, Dominic, following his COVID-19 vaccination.
Key details from her testimony included:
Remembrance & Loss: She spoke about her 23-year marriage to Dominic, remembering him as a devoted husband and father whose life was cut short.
Onset of Symptoms and Health Decline: Lavalle detailed his rapid physical deterioration following vaccination, which led to brain scans, rare neurological complications, ICU admission, and ultimately his passing.
Dismissal by Medical Staff: She described facing recurring dismissal from healthcare providers when attempting to raise concerns about a possible vaccine adverse reaction, stating that medical personnel repeatedly told her he was "just an unlucky guy with bad luck."
Fulfilling a Promise: She shared that she broke five years of painful silence to testify in order to fulfill a promise she made at his bedside—to act as his voice and ensure his death was never reduced to a mere statistic.
For a direct look at her sworn statement, you can watch
------------------------------------------
What did Nicole Maurier have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Nicole Maurier delivered sworn testimony detailing the story of her daughter, Abigail, a young cardiology technologist with Alberta Health Services who passed away following a rare cancer diagnosis.
Key points from her testimony included:
Workplace Mandate and Denied Exemptions: Maurier testified that Abigail initially expressed deep hesitations about taking the COVID-19 vaccines, but complied with Pfizer doses in late 2021 to retain her cardiology job after both her employer and family physician denied her requests for a medical exemption.
Rapid Health Decline and Diagnosis: Seventeen months post-injection, Abigail was admitted to the emergency room with a fluid-filled collapsed lung and a massive chest tumor. She was diagnosed with NUT carcinoma—an extremely rare and aggressive form of cancer.
Medical Documentation: Maurier testified that Abigail's family doctor subsequently recorded "NUT carcinoma post COVID-19 vaccination" under the adverse event section on her federal Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) medical assessment forms.
Passing and Support Program Delays: Abigail passed away on May 2, 2023, just six weeks after her diagnosis, due to rapid tumor growth and organ failure. Maurier detailed her ongoing, multi-year struggles with the federal support program, citing endless administrative requests, paperwork delays, and portal access issues without claim resolution.
Policy Demands: Maurier called for formal legal protections against employer vaccine mandates outside employment contracts, as well as greater accountability for medical regulatory associations regarding physician oversight and patient care.
What did Julie Ivan have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Julie Ivan, a long-time Canada Post mail carrier and avid long-distance runner, delivered sworn testimony detailing severe, progressive neurological damage following her second dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine on June 30, 2021.
Key points from her testimony included:
Life Prior to Vaccination: Ivan described being an active long-distance athlete who ran the 30-km Around the Bay race for five consecutive years and walked up to 20 kilometers daily in her 20+ year career as a mail carrier.
Onset of Symptoms & Diagnosis: Days after her second dose, she experienced progressive numbness traveling from her feet up to her chest, electric shock sensations, and paralysis-like symptoms. Emergency hospital visits, MRIs, and lumbar punctures revealed spinal cord lesions caused by an immune response. Her treating specialists (including her neurologist and rheumatologist) acknowledged the connection between her symptoms and the vaccine.
Ongoing Health Struggles: She testified about living with permanent nerve damage, burning nerve pain, chronic fatigue, and new brain lesions detected in recent MRIs, noting that her doctors informed her there is no cure and she must manage her symptoms daily.
Impact on Work and Daily Functioning: Because she can no longer walk long distances outside, she had to leave outdoor mail delivery and reassess her career, being reassigned to an office role. Simple daily tasks—such as dressing or walking more than 500 feet—are severely impaired.
Social and Institutional Frustrations: She expressed frustration over feeling unheard by mainstream media, the difficulty of being believed by those around her, and the absence of clear public discussion surrounding vaccine injuries.
Her testimony can be viewed in
-----------------------------------------
What did Eva Caven have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry, Eva Caven, a veteran registered nurse and geriatric case manager with 42 years of service in healthcare, delivered sworn testimony detailing sudden severe eye complications and vision loss following her COVID-19 vaccination.
Key points from her testimony included:
Background and Baseline Health: Caven highlighted her 42-year career dedicated to geriatric healthcare and noted that just days prior to her injection, an eye checkup confirmed she had 20/20 vision.
Onset of Symptoms and Vision Loss: Shortly after her vaccination in March 2021, she experienced severe, sudden ocular complications that rapidly progressed to blindness in one eye.
Medical Interventions and Chronic Pain: She described undergoing emergency medical visits, multiple eye surgeries, and medical treatments while dealing with persistent, daily chronic pain associated with her eye injury.
Impact on Career and Social Life: Caven testified that the resulting vision loss and chronic health issues forced her into early retirement from nursing. She also spoke about the social isolation and challenges she experienced when attempting to speak out about her condition.
Her full statement can be viewed in
------------------------------------
What did Jannine Duffy have to say on day 2 of the inquiry?
On Day 2 (September 9, 2026) of the Allison Inquiry—an unofficial, citizen-led hearing in Ottawa chaired by MP Dean Allison regarding COVID-19 vaccine injuries—Jannine Duffy appeared as a witness to describe her experience following vaccination.
Key aspects of her testimony included:
Assisted Testimony: Due to the severity of her condition and injuries, Jannine Duffy testified with the assistance and support of her daughter, Jennifer Britton.
Personal Account of Injury: She detailed the significant physical onset and health complications she experienced following her COVID-19 vaccination, describing the severe impact it had on her daily living and functioning.
Challenges with Healthcare & Recognition: Like many witnesses testifying at the inquiry, her testimony touched on the ongoing struggles to obtain appropriate medical recognition, specialist care, and systemic support for post-vaccination health issues in Canada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OuiGmDt42E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi9vL0nEqUA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjKHjipEwow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vm8eA15lwhI
No comments:
Post a Comment